Literature DB >> 16524004

Response speeding mediates the contributions of cue familiarity and target retrievability to metamnemonic judgments.

Aaron S Benjamin1.   

Abstract

Metamnemonic judgments are influenced by the retrievability of the target memory in question, but also by the familiarity of the cue used to elicit such judgments. However, there have been few suggestions as to what factors mediate the influence of these different sources of information on metamnemonic judgments. In this experiment, I examined the interactions between prediction time pressure and variables that promote either cue familiarity or target retrievability. The data reveal that target retrievability plays a larger role than does cue familiarity in fostering predictions of future recall made under unpressured conditions, but that cue familiarity influences predictions that are speeded. This pattern is interpreted by analogy with recognition memory: Mnemonic evidence based on familiarity is more impervious to the demands of time pressure than are the products of deliberative retrieval. Several explanations for this effect are suggested.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16524004     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  16 in total

1.  Parallel effects of aging and time pressure on memory for source: evidence from the spacing effect.

Authors:  A S Benjamin; F I Craik
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-07

2.  Delaying judgments of learning affects memory, not metamemory.

Authors:  Daniel R Kimball; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-09

3.  Cue familiarity but not target retrievability enhances feeling-of-knowing judgments.

Authors:  B L Schwartz; J Metcalfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  On the relation between feeling of knowing and lexical decision: persistent subthreshold activation or topic familiarity?

Authors:  L T Connor; D A Balota; J H Neely
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Ironic effects of repetition: measuring age-related differences in memory.

Authors:  L L Jacoby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 6.  Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy.

Authors:  A Koriat; M Goldsmith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing.

Authors:  A Koriat
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions.

Authors:  T O Nelson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  On the dual effects of repetition on false recognition.

Authors:  A S Benjamin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  The mismeasure of memory: when retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index.

Authors:  A S Benjamin; R A Bjork; B L Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1998-03
View more
  10 in total

1.  On the effectiveness of self-paced learning.

Authors:  Jonathan G Tullis; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Judgments for inaccessible targets: comparing recognition without identification and the feeling of knowing.

Authors:  Jason S Nomi; Anne M Cleary
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-11

3.  Benefits of Accumulating Versus Diminishing Cues in Recall.

Authors:  Jason R Finley; Aaron S Benjamin; Matthew J Hays; Robert A Bjork; Nate Kornell
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Consequences of restudy choices in younger and older learners.

Authors:  Jonathan G Tullis; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

5.  Age differences in the use of beneficial and misleading cues in recall: with a comment on the measurement of between-group differences in accuracy.

Authors:  Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.645

6.  A cross-race effect in metamemory: Predictions of face recognition are more accurate for members of our own race.

Authors:  Kathleen L Hourihan; Aaron S Benjamin; Xiping Liu
Journal:  J Appl Res Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-02

7.  What happened (and what didn't): Discourse constraints on encoding of plausible alternatives.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; Aaron S Benjamin; Duane G Watson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  Simultaneous utilization of multiple cues in judgments of learning.

Authors:  Monika Undorf; Anke Söllner; Arndt Bröder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-05

9.  The sensitivity of judgment-of-learning resolution to past test performance, new learning, and forgetting.

Authors:  Robert Ariel; John Dunlosky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-01

10.  The effects of proactive interference (PI) and release from PI on judgments of learning.

Authors:  Michael Diaz; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.