Literature DB >> 16523815

Prognostic value of haemoglobin levels during concurrent radio-chemotherapy in the treatment of oesophageal cancer.

D Rades1, S Lang, S E Schild, W Alberti.   

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the prognostic value of haemoglobin levels during radio-chemotherapy for overall survival, metastases-free survival (MFS) and locoregional control in patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Age, gender, performance status, tumour location, tumour length, histology, histologic grading, T-stage, N-stage, UICC-stage and weekly haemoglobin levels during concurrent radio-chemotherapy were retrospectively investigated and related to outcome in 108 patients, who received radio-chemotherapy for stage II/III oesophageal cancer. Radio-chemotherapy consisted of 59.4-60 Gy irradiation, two to four courses of cisplatin (75 mg/m2 on day 1) and 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m2 on days 1-5). Haemoglobin levels during radio-chemotherapy were compared among the following three groups: patients with over 60% of haemoglobin levels less than 12 g/dl; patients with over 60% of haemoglobin levels at 12-14 g/dl; and patients with over 60% of haemoglobin levels greater than 14 g/dl.
RESULTS: On univariate analysis, haemoglobin levels of 12-14 g/dl and greater than 14 g/dl during concurrent radio-chemotherapy provided better outcomes than haemoglobin levels less than 12 g/dl. The 2-year overall survival rates were 34%, 35% and 16%, respectively (P = 0.002). The 2-year MFS survival rates were 23%, 46% and 21%, respectively (P = 0.06). The 2-year locoregional control rates were 44%, 58% and 19%, respectively (P < 0.001). ECOG performance status (1 better than 2-3) was significantly associated with overall survival (P = 0.013), tumour length (<7 cm better than > or = 7 cm) with overall survival (P = 0.002) and MFS (P = 0.002), N-stage (N0 better than N1) with overall survival (P = 0.004) and MFS (P < 0.001), and UICC-stage (stage II better than III) with overall survival (P = 0.025) and MFS (P = 0.010). On multivariate analysis, haemoglobin levels during radio-chemotherapy maintained significance for overall survival (P = 0.002) and locoregional control (P < 0.001), tumour length for overall survival (P = 0.002) and MFS (P = 0.008), and N-stage for MFS (P = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Haemoglobin during radiotherapy and concurrent radio-chemotherapy is an independent prognostic factor in oesophageal cancer treatment. To improve outcome, it seems important to maintain the haemoglobin at 12-14 g/dl.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16523815     DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2005.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)        ISSN: 0936-6555            Impact factor:   4.126


  4 in total

1.  Temporal patterns of fatigue predict pathologic response in patients treated with preoperative chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Hee Chul Park; Nora A Janjan; Tito R Mendoza; Edward H Lin; Saroj Vadhan-Raj; Mandeep Hundal; Yiqun Zhang; Marc E Delclos; Christopher H Crane; Prajnan Das; Xin Shelley Wang; Charles S Cleeland; Sunil Krishnan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Is Hemoglobin Level in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Still a Significant Prognostic Factor in the Era of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Technology?

Authors:  Shan-Shan Guo; Lin-Quan Tang; Qiu-Yan Chen; Lu Zhang; Li-Ting Liu; Pei-Yu Huang; Ka-Jia Cao; Ling Guo; Hao-Yuan Mo; Xiang Guo; Ming-Huang Hong; Mu-Sheng Zeng; Chao-Nan Qian; Hai-Qiang Mai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Anaemia and its effects on tumour regression grade and survival following chemotherapy in adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus.

Authors:  Alexander N C Boucher; Oliver Ng; John H Saunders; Austin G Acheson; Simon L Parsons
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2018-10

4.  The development of a nomogram to predict post-radiation necrosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a large-scale cohort study.

Authors:  Xiao-Yun Li; Xue-Song Sun; Sai-Lan Liu; Lin-Quan Tang; Hai-Qiang Mai; Qiu-Yan Chen; Shan-Shan Guo; Li-Ting Liu; Jin-Jie Yan; Hao-Jun Xie; Qing-Nan Tang; Yu-Jing Liang; Ling Guo
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 3.989

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.