Literature DB >> 16523613

Divergent selection on feather pecking behavior in laying hens has caused differences between lines in egg production, egg quality, and feed efficiency.

G Su1, J B Kjaer, P Sørensen.   

Abstract

The correlated changes in egg production, egg quality, and feed efficiency (FE) due to selection for feather pecking (FP) were investigated by analyzing the data from an experiment including 2 divergently selected lines and a control line. The experiment was conducted with hens from 42 to 46 wk (hatch 1) and 39 to 43 wk (hatch 2) of age in the fifth generation of selection. The number of FP bouts per hour in the low FP line (LFP) was lower than the high FP line (HFP; 0.38 vs. 2.01), and total plumage score in line LFP was better than in line HFP (16.9 vs. 11.6). During the 4 wk, egg number and egg mass in line LFP were higher than those in HFP (24.4 vs. 18.3 and 1,223 vs. 1,132 g, respectively). On the other hand, line HFP had greater egg weight (60.7 vs. 59.2 g), albumen height (73.0 vs. 64.9 in Haugh units), shell thickness (38.1 vs. 37.0 mm), and yolk percentage (30.6 vs. 29.5%) than the LFP line. The control line was intermediate for those traits. The residual feed consumption (RFC) was highest in line HFP, lowest in line LFP, and intermediate in line C. Partial regressions of feed consumption (FC) on BW gain and egg mass were not significantly different among the 3 lines, whereas a significant difference in regression on metabolic BW (32.6 g/d in line LFP, 38.0 g/d in control line, and 43.4 g/d in line HFP) was observed. In addition, there was a negative regression of FC per day on plumage score (-1.73 g). The adjustment for plumage score accounted for 60% of the difference between regressions on metabolic BW in lines LFP and HFP. These results indicated that selection for FP has led to a change in egg production, egg quality, and FE. The better FE in line LFP resulted from a lower requirement for maintenance energy. The later was partly accounted for by a better plumage cover.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16523613     DOI: 10.1093/ps/85.2.191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  9 in total

1.  Effects of poor plumage conditions on egg production, antioxidant status and gene expression in laying hens.

Authors:  Junying Li; Chengjie Zhang; Ruiyu Ma; Renrong Qi; Yi Wan; Wei Liu; Tao Zhao; Yan Li; Kai Zhan
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Can Non-Beak Treated Hens be Kept in Commercial Furnished Cages? Exploring the Effects of Strain and Extra Environmental Enrichment on Behaviour, Feather Cover, and Mortality.

Authors:  Krysta L H Morrissey; Sarah Brocklehurst; Laurence Baker; Tina M Widowski; Victoria Sandilands
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  A meta-analysis on the effect of environmental enrichment on feather pecking and feather damage in laying hens.

Authors:  Nienke van Staaveren; Jennifer Ellis; Christine F Baes; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Effect of Providing Environmental Enrichment into Aviary House on the Welfare of Laying Hens.

Authors:  Jiseon Son; Woo-Do Lee; Hee-Jin Kim; Bo-Seok Kang; Hwan-Ku Kang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Individual Consistency of Feather Pecking Behavior in Laying Hens: Once a Feather Pecker Always a Feather Pecker?

Authors:  Courtney L Daigle; T Bas Rodenburg; J Elizabeth Bolhuis; Janice C Swanson; Janice M Siegford
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2015-04-14

Review 6.  Omnivores Going Astray: A Review and New Synthesis of Abnormal Behavior in Pigs and Laying Hens.

Authors:  Emma I Brunberg; T Bas Rodenburg; Lotta Rydhmer; Joergen B Kjaer; Per Jensen; Linda J Keeling
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-07-22

7.  Feather Pecking and Cannibalism in Non-Beak-Trimmed Laying Hen Flocks-Farmers' Perspectives.

Authors:  Eija Kaukonen; Anna Valros
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Meta-analyses of genome wide association studies in lines of laying hens divergently selected for feather pecking using imputed sequence level genotypes.

Authors:  Clemens Falker-Gieske; Hanna Iffland; Siegfried Preuß; Werner Bessei; Cord Drögemüller; Jörn Bennewitz; Jens Tetens
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.797

9.  Effects of edible environmental enrichments during the rearing and laying periods in a littered aviary-Part 2: physical development of pullets and performance, egg quality, and carcass composition in laying hens.

Authors:  Ruben Schreiter; Klaus Damme; Michael Klunker; Camille Raoult; Eberhard von Borell; Markus Freick
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 3.352

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.