Literature DB >> 16523279

[Subclavian thrombosis after port system implantation].

E Roller1, T Ruzicka, K-W Schulte.   

Abstract

The use of implanted central venous catheters with ports has become almost irreplaceable in clinical treatment of cancer patients with advanced disease. It improves the patient's quality of life and simplifies medical treatment. For safe use during outpatient follow-up treatment, possible complications such as wound infections, thrombosis or even pulmonary embolism have to be considered. The incidence of catheter-associated thrombosis in cancer patients has been estimated as 25-66% in screening evaluations. Clinical symptoms were present in only in 6-28% of all patients with diagnosed thromboses. We report on a patient with metastatic malignant melanoma, who developed a deep arm vein thrombosis two weeks after port implantation. The prognosis of deep arm vein thrombosis is determined by the development of pulmonary embolism (8-36%). In such cases, early diagnosis and treatment are essential for the patient's survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 16523279     DOI: 10.1007/s00105-006-1098-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hautarzt        ISSN: 0017-8470            Impact factor:   0.751


  25 in total

1.  Role of D-dimers in diagnosis of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  J Kelly; B J Hunt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-02-09       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Hylton V Joffe; Samuel Z Goldhaber
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  [Subclavian intravenous injection; advantages and technic].

Authors:  R AUBANIAC
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1952-10-25       Impact factor: 1.228

4.  Central venous thrombosis: an early and frequent complication in cancer patients bearing long-term silastic catheter. A prospective study.

Authors:  M De Cicco; M Matovic; L Balestreri; G Panarello; D Fantin; S Morassut; V Testa
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 3.944

5.  Is long-term low-molecular-weight heparin acceptable to palliative care patients in the treatment of cancer related venous thromboembolism? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Simon I R Noble; I G Finlay
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.762

6.  Characterization and probability of upper extremity deep venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Zachary C Schmittling; Robert B McLafferty; W Todd Bohannon; Don E Ramsey; Kim J Hodgson
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 1.466

7.  Sonographic evaluation of upper extremity deep venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Eva E Chin; Peter T Zimmerman; Edward G Grant
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Randomized comparison of low molecular weight heparin and coumarin derivatives on the survival of patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Agnes Y Y Lee; Frederick R Rickles; Jim A Julian; Michael Gent; Ross I Baker; Chris Bowden; Ajay K Kakkar; Martin Prins; Mark N Levine
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-02-07       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Subclavian vein thrombosis in patients treated with infusion chemotherapy for advanced malignancy.

Authors:  J J Lokich; B Becker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Central venous catheter related thrombosis in haematology patients and prediction of risk by screening with Doppler-ultrasound.

Authors:  Cornelis J van Rooden; Frits R Rosendaal; Renée M Y Barge; Jacques A van Oostayen; Felix J M van der Meer; A Edo Meinders; Menno V Huisman
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.998

View more
  2 in total

1.  [How should urologists perform implantation of subcutaneous central venous port systems? A single center experience of 347 cases].

Authors:  M Schenck; W Michels-Oswald; S Tschirdewahn; H Rübben; F Vom Dorp; A Rose; A Panic; C Niedworok; R Rossi
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Central venous port implantations via the cephalic vein applying an intravasal electrographic control of the catheter tip position: a single-center experience of 316 cases.

Authors:  Marcus Schenck; Tim Schneider; Herbert Rübben; Andreas Eisenhardt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 4.226

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.