MOTIVATION: In microarray gene expression studies, the number of replicated microarrays is usually small because of cost and sample availability, resulting in unreliable variance estimation and thus unreliable statistical hypothesis tests. The unreliable variance estimation is further complicated by the fact that the technology-specific variance is intrinsically intensity-dependent. RESULTS: The Rosetta error model captures the variance-intensity relationship for various types of microarray technologies, such as single-color arrays and two-color arrays. This error model conservatively estimates intensity error and uses this value to stabilize the variance estimation. We present two commonly used error models: the intensity error-model for single-color microarrays and the ratio error model for two-color microarrays or ratios built from two single-color arrays. We present examples to demonstrate the strength of our error models in improving statistical power of microarray data analysis, particularly, in increasing expression detection sensitivity and specificity when the number of replicates is limited.
MOTIVATION: In microarray gene expression studies, the number of replicated microarrays is usually small because of cost and sample availability, resulting in unreliable variance estimation and thus unreliable statistical hypothesis tests. The unreliable variance estimation is further complicated by the fact that the technology-specific variance is intrinsically intensity-dependent. RESULTS: The Rosetta error model captures the variance-intensity relationship for various types of microarray technologies, such as single-color arrays and two-color arrays. This error model conservatively estimates intensity error and uses this value to stabilize the variance estimation. We present two commonly used error models: the intensity error-model for single-color microarrays and the ratio error model for two-color microarrays or ratios built from two single-color arrays. We present examples to demonstrate the strength of our error models in improving statistical power of microarray data analysis, particularly, in increasing expression detection sensitivity and specificity when the number of replicates is limited.
Authors: Maria Sentandreu; Guiomar Martín; Nahuel González-Schain; Pablo Leivar; Judit Soy; James M Tepperman; Peter H Quail; Elena Monte Journal: Plant Cell Date: 2011-11-22 Impact factor: 11.277
Authors: Xia Yang; Bin Zhang; Cliona Molony; Eugene Chudin; Ke Hao; Jun Zhu; Andrea Gaedigk; Christine Suver; Hua Zhong; J Steven Leeder; F Peter Guengerich; Stephen C Strom; Erin Schuetz; Thomas H Rushmore; Roger G Ulrich; J Greg Slatter; Eric E Schadt; Andrew Kasarskis; Pek Yee Lum Journal: Genome Res Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Pervinder Sagoo; Esperanza Perucha; Birgit Sawitzki; Stefan Tomiuk; David A Stephens; Patrick Miqueu; Stephanie Chapman; Ligia Craciun; Ruhena Sergeant; Sophie Brouard; Flavia Rovis; Elvira Jimenez; Amany Ballow; Magali Giral; Irene Rebollo-Mesa; Alain Le Moine; Cecile Braudeau; Rachel Hilton; Bernhard Gerstmayer; Katarzyna Bourcier; Adnan Sharif; Magdalena Krajewska; Graham M Lord; Ian Roberts; Michel Goldman; Kathryn J Wood; Kenneth Newell; Vicki Seyfert-Margolis; Anthony N Warrens; Uwe Janssen; Hans-Dieter Volk; Jean-Paul Soulillou; Maria P Hernandez-Fuentes; Robert I Lechler Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2010-05-24 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Kai Tan; Hoda Feizi; Colin Luo; Stephanie H Fan; Timothy Ravasi; Trey G Ideker Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-02-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Annuska M Glas; Arno Floore; Leonie J M J Delahaye; Anke T Witteveen; Rob C F Pover; Niels Bakx; Jaana S T Lahti-Domenici; Tako J Bruinsma; Marc O Warmoes; René Bernards; Lodewyk F A Wessels; Laura J Van't Veer Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2006-10-30 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: H Karimi Kinyamu; Jennifer B Collins; Sherry F Grissom; Pratibha B Hebbar; Trevor K Archer Journal: Mol Carcinog Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 4.784
Authors: A Kenneth MacLeod; Michael McMahon; Simon M Plummer; Larry G Higgins; Trevor M Penning; Kazuhiko Igarashi; John D Hayes Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2009-07-16 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Lois A Annab; Carl D Bortner; Marie I Sifre; Jennifer M Collins; Ruchir R Shah; Darlene Dixon; H Karimi Kinyamu; Trevor K Archer Journal: Differentiation Date: 2012-08-18 Impact factor: 3.880