Literature DB >> 16522227

Thermal behaviour of crustaceans.

Kari Y H Lagerspetz1, Liisa A Vainio.   

Abstract

Specific thermoreceptors or putative multimodal thermoreceptors are not known in Crustacea. However, behavioural studies on thermal avoidance and preference and on the effects of temperature on motor activity indicate that the thermosensitivity of crustaceans may be in the range 0.2-2 degrees C. Work on planktonic crustaceans suggests that they respond particularly to changes in temperature by klinokinesis and orthokinesis. The thermal behaviour of crustaceans is modified by thermal acclimation among other factors. The acclimation of the critical maximum temperature is an example of resistance acclimation, while the acclimation of preference behaviour may be classified as capacity acclimation of some other function. In crustaceans, the use of the concepts stenothermy and eurythermy at the species level is questionable, and it is not possible to divide crustacean species into thermal guilds as suggested for fishes. Thermal preference behaviour contributes to fitness in different ways in different species, often by maximising the aerobic metabolic scope for activity. In crustaceans the peripheral nervous system seems to have retained the capacity for thermosensitivity and thermal acclimation independently of the central nervous system control of behaviour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16522227     DOI: 10.1017/S1464793105006998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  10 in total

1.  Many parameter sets in a multicompartment model oscillator are robust to temperature perturbations.

Authors:  Jonathan S Caplan; Alex H Williams; Eve Marder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Thermal tolerance of the crab Pachygrapsus marmoratus: intraspecific differences at a physiological (CTMax) and molecular level (Hsp70).

Authors:  D Madeira; L Narciso; H N Cabral; M S Diniz; C Vinagre
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.667

3.  Toxicity of two fungicides in Daphnia: is it always temperature-dependent?

Authors:  Ana P Cuco; Nelson Abrantes; Fernando Gonçalves; Justyna Wolinska; Bruno B Castro
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Electrophysiological Investigation of Different Methods of Anesthesia in Lobster and Crayfish.

Authors:  Torsten Fregin; Ulf Bickmeyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Thermal Preference Ranges Correlate with Stable Signals of Universal Stress Markers in Lake Baikal Endemic and Holarctic Amphipods.

Authors:  Denis Axenov-Gribanov; Daria Bedulina; Zhanna Shatilina; Lena Jakob; Kseniya Vereshchagina; Yulia Lubyaga; Anton Gurkov; Ekaterina Shchapova; Till Luckenbach; Magnus Lucassen; Franz Josef Sartoris; Hans-Otto Pörtner; Maxim Timofeyev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Antagonistic effects of biological invasion and environmental warming on detritus processing in freshwater ecosystems.

Authors:  Daniel Kenna; William N W Fincham; Alison M Dunn; Lee E Brown; Christopher Hassall
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Acclimation temperature affects thermal reaction norms for energy reserves in Drosophila.

Authors:  Peter Klepsatel; Thirnahalli Nagaraj Girish; Martina Gáliková
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A new approach to assessing the space use behavior of macroinvertebrates by automated video tracking.

Authors:  Milad Shokri; Francesco Cozzoli; Mario Ciotti; Vojsava Gjoni; Vanessa Marrocco; Fabio Vignes; Alberto Basset
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Interactions Between Temperature Variability and Reproductive Physiology Across Traits in an Intertidal Crab.

Authors:  Emily K Lam; Metadel Abegaz; Alex R Gunderson; Brian Tsukimura; Jonathon H Stillman
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Some like it hot: factors impacting thermal preferences of two Ponto-Caspian amphipods Dikerogammarus villosus (Sovinsky, 1894) and Dikerogammarus haemobaphes (Eichwald, 1841).

Authors:  Michał Rachalewski; Jarosław Kobak; Eliza Szczerkowska-Majchrzak; Karolina Bącela-Spychalska
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.984

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.