Literature DB >> 16521840

Fueling global fishing fleets.

Peter H Tyedmers1, Reg Watson, Daniel Pauly.   

Abstract

Over the course of the 20th century, fossil fuels became the dominant energy input to most of the world's fisheries. Although various analyses have quantified fuel inputs to individual fisheries, to date, no attempt has been made to quantify the global scale and to map the distribution of fuel consumed by fisheries. By integrating data representing more than 250 fisheries from around the world with spatially resolved catch statistics for 2000, we calculate that globally, fisheries burned almost 50 billion L of fuel in the process of landing just over 80 million t of marine fish and invertebrates for an average rate of 620 L t(-1). Consequently, fisheries account for about 1.2% of global oil consumption, an amount equivalent to that burned by the Netherlands, the 18th-ranked oil consuming country globally, and directly emit more than 130 million t of CO2 into the atmosphere. From an efficiency perspective, the energy content of the fuel burned by global fisheries is 12.5 times greater than the edible-protein energy content of the resulting catch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16521840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ambio        ISSN: 0044-7447            Impact factor:   5.129


  9 in total

1.  Edible protein energy return on investment ratio (ep-EROI) for Spanish seafood products.

Authors:  Ian Vázquez-Rowe; Pedro Villanueva-Rey; M Teresa Moreira; Gumersindo Feijoo
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Life cycle considerations for improving sustainability assessments in seafood awareness campaigns.

Authors:  Nathan Pelletier; Peter Tyedmers
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 3.  Food security and marine capture fisheries: characteristics, trends, drivers and future perspectives.

Authors:  Serge M Garcia; Andrew A Rosenberg
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Interannual variability of fisheries economic returns and energy ratios is mostly explained by gear type.

Authors:  Verena M Trenkel; Fabienne Daurès; Marie-Joëlle Rochet; Pascal Lorance
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Winners and losers in a world where the high seas is closed to fishing.

Authors:  U Rashid Sumaila; Vicky W Y Lam; Dana D Miller; Louise Teh; Reg A Watson; Dirk Zeller; William W L Cheung; Isabelle M Côté; Alex D Rogers; Callum Roberts; Enric Sala; Daniel Pauly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Seafood from a changing Arctic.

Authors:  Max Troell; Arne Eide; John Isaksen; Øystein Hermansen; Anne-Sophie Crépin
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.129

7.  Coupled ecosystem/supply chain modelling of fish products from sea to shelf: the Peruvian anchoveta case.

Authors:  Angel Avadí; Pierre Fréon; Jorge Tam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The implementation of rare events logistic regression to predict the distribution of mesophotic hard corals across the main Hawaiian Islands.

Authors:  Lindsay M Veazey; Erik C Franklin; Christopher Kelley; John Rooney; L Neil Frazer; Robert J Toonen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  When too much isn't enough: Does current food production meet global nutritional needs?

Authors:  Krishna Bahadur Kc; Goretty M Dias; Anastasia Veeramani; Clarence J Swanton; David Fraser; Dirk Steinke; Elizabeth Lee; Hannah Wittman; Jeffrey M Farber; Kari Dunfield; Kevin McCann; Madhur Anand; Malcolm Campbell; Neil Rooney; Nigel E Raine; Rene Van Acker; Robert Hanner; Samantha Pascoal; Shayan Sharif; Tim G Benton; Evan D G Fraser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.