Literature DB >> 16521621

Biomechanical validation of a specific upper body training and testing drill in cross-country skiing.

Thomas Stöggl1, Stefan Lindinger, Erich Müller.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to perform a biomechanical validation of a double poling imitation drill on a rollerboard. Six elite cross-country skiers performed three imitation drill trials at maximal speed at 13 degrees inclination and in double poling on roller skis on a paved road of 3 degrees. Pole and strap forces, elbow and hip angles and EMG activity of eight upper body muscles were measured. Force curves showed similar characteristics, except for impact force occurring only at pole plant in double poling on roller skis. Double poling on a rollerboard includes an eccentric roll-down phase not appearing in double polling on roller skis. Forces on the rollerboard were similar to those on roller skis. Courses of the elbow angles indicated similar shapes, except for the angle at the start of the propulsion phase and, consequently, during flexion (p < 0.01). Propulsion time and cycle duration were longer and frequency lower on the rollerboard (all p < 0.001). Muscle activities were not significantly different, except for stronger biceps brachii (p < 0.01) and weaker erector spinae activation (p < 0.05) on the rollerboard. Muscle coordination patterns showed similar onset and offset points of each muscle and comparable activations in both activities, except for biceps brachii. Two movement strategies on the rollerboard were found, which led to small differences in measured variables. The biomechanical validity of double poling on a rollerboard can be judged as moderately high, being aware of the differences in some variables that might be considered in training sessions on the rollerboard, particularly when using intervals with high number of repetitions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16521621     DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2006.9628223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Biomech        ISSN: 1476-3141            Impact factor:   2.832


  3 in total

1.  Mechanical and physiological effects of varying pole weights during Nordic walking compared to walking.

Authors:  Thorsten Schiffer; Axel Knicker; Melissa Montanarella; Heiko K Strüder
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-11-28       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The physiological responses to repeated upper-body sprint exercise in highly trained athletes.

Authors:  Øyvind Sandbakk; Tommy Fredriksen Skålvik; Matt Spencer; Mireille van Beekvelt; Boye Welde; Ann Magdalen Hegge; Terje Gjøvaag; Gertjan Ettema
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Acute Effects of an Ergometer-Based Dryland Alpine Skiing Specific High Intensity Interval Training.

Authors:  Thomas Stöggl; Josef Kröll; Roland Helmberger; Maria Cudrigh; Erich Müller
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 4.566

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.