Literature DB >> 16520907

Hypofractionated conformal HDR brachytherapy in hormone naïve men with localized prostate cancer. Is escalation to very high biologically equivalent dose beneficial in all prognostic risk groups?

Razvan M Galalae1, Alvaro Martinez, Nils Nuernberg, Gregory Edmundson, Gary Gustafson, Jose Gonzalez, Bernhard Kimming.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the long-term effect of local dose escalation using conformal hypofractionated high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost and pelvic external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in hormone-naïve men with localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 579 men were consecutively treated with pelvic EBRT and dose escalating HDR-BT since 1986 in two prospective trials: 378 patients at William Beaumont Hospital (1991-2002), and 201 patients at Kiel University (1986-1999). BT optimization was done modulating both, the dwell times and spatial source positions. A short course of neoadjuvant/concurrent androgen deprivation therapy was given to 222 patients. Hormone-naïve patients only (n = 324) with a follow-up > or = 18 months were analyzed. All patients had at least one poor prognostic factor (stage > or = T2b, Gleason Score > or = 7, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen [PSA] > or = 10 ng/ml): any one factor 122 patients, any two factors 122 patients, and three factors 80 patients. This cohort was stratified by equivalent dose (ED): dose level 1, < or = 94 Gy, n = 58, and dose level 2, > 94 Gy, n = 266, assuming an alpha/beta ratio of 1.2. The ASTRO definition for biochemical failure was used.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 5.3 years (1.5-13.9 years). For all 324 patients, the 5-year biochemical control (BC) rate was 79%. Cancer-specific survival was 98%, and overall survival 90%. Similar analysis by institution demonstrated no difference in outcomes. For the entire cohort of hormone-naïve men, dose escalation to > 94 Gy resulted in a better 5-year BC of 59% versus 85% (p < 0.001). Discriminating by risk group a striking dose escalation effect was seen in the groups with two or three poor prognostic factors (p = 0.022 and < 0.001, respectively). In the group with only one poor prognostic factor, no statistical difference could be detected questioning the need for ED > 94 Gy.
CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that conformal HDR-BT is a successful method for delivering very high radiation dose to the prostate. The ability to escalate dose to ED > 94 Gy was reflected in improved long-term outcomes in terms of BC, significantly for those patients with two or three poor prognostic factors reaching BC rates of 85%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16520907     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-006-1448-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  13 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of advanced technologies in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Amy S Harrison; Edouard J Trabulsi; Leonard G Gomella; Timothy N Showalter; Mark D Hurwitz; Adam P Dicker; Robert B Den
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  The German S3 guideline prostate cancer: aspects for the radiation oncologist.

Authors:  Frederik Wenz; Thomas Martin; Dirk Böhmer; Stefan Martens; Felix Sedlmayer; Manfred Wirth; Kurt Miller; Axel Heidenreich; Mark Schrader; Wolfgang Hinkelbein; Thomas Wiegel
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 3.  High dose rate prostate brachytherapy: an overview of the rationale, experience and emerging applications in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A Challapalli; E Jones; C Harvey; G O Hellawell; S A Mangar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  The evolution of brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Brian J Davis; Paul L Nguyen; Timothy N Showalter; Peter J Hoskin; Yasuo Yoshioka; Gerard C Morton; Eric M Horwitz
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  [High-dose rate brachytherapy for high-risk prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Schenck; K Krause; R Schwandtner; I Haase; D Fluehs; J Friedrich; T Jaeger; C Boergermann; H Ruebben; M Stuschke
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  [Radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the new S3 guideline. Part 2: postoperative radiation therapy and brachytherapy].

Authors:  T Martin; F Wenz; D Böhmer; F Sedlmayer; W Hinkelbein; T O Henkel; K Miller; T Wiegel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  [Brachytherapy of the prostate cancer].

Authors:  S H Stübinger; R Wilhelm; S Kaufmann; M Döring; S Hautmann; K P Jünemann; R Galalae
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Brachytherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Georgios Koukourakis; Nikolaos Kelekis; Vassilios Armonis; Vassilios Kouloulias
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2009-09-01

Review 9.  Hypofractionated radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer. Review of clinical trials.

Authors:  Víctor Macías; Albert Biete
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.405

10.  The impact of prostate volume changes during external-beam irradiation in consequence of HDR brachytherapy in prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Markus Karl Alfred Herrmann; Tammo Gsänger; Arne Strauss; Tereza Kertesz; Hendrik A Wolff; Hans Christiansen; Hilke Vorwerk; Clemens Friedrich Hess; Andrea Hille
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.