Literature DB >> 16519313

Atrazine increases the sodium absorption in frog (Rana esculenta) skin.

Giuseppe Cassano1, Vito Bellantuono, Concetta Ardizzone, Claudio Lippe.   

Abstract

The presence of atrazine in agricultural sites has been linked to the decline in amphibian populations. The efforts of the scientific community generally are directed toward investigating the long-term effect of atrazine on complex functions (reproduction or respiration), but in the present study, we investigated the short-term effect on the short-circuit current (I(sc)), a quantitative measure of the ion transport operated by frog (Rana esculenta) skin. Treatment with 5 microM atrazine (1.08 mg/L) does not affect the transepithelial outfluxes of [14C]mannitol or [14C]urea; therefore, atrazine does not damage the barrier properties of frog skin. Atrazine causes a dose-dependent increase in the short-circuit current, with a minimum of 4.64 +/- 0.76 microA/cm2 (11.05% +/- 1.22%) and a maximum of 12.7 +/- 0.7 microA/cm2 (35% +/- 2.4%) measured at 10 nM and 5 microM, respectively. An increase in Isc also is caused by 5 microM ametryne, prometryn, simazine, terbuthylazine, or terbutryn (other atrazine derivatives). In particular, atrazine increases the transepithelial 22Na+ influx without affecting the outflux. Finally, stimulation of Isc by atrazine is suppressed by SQ 22536, H89, U73122, 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate, and W7 (blockers of adenylate cyclase, protein kinase A, phospholipase C, intracellular Ca2+ increase, and calmodulin, respectively), whereas indomethacin and calphostin C (inhibitors of cyclooxygenase and protein kinase C, respectively) have no effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16519313     DOI: 10.1897/05-141r.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  2 in total

Review 1.  Frog Skin Innate Immune Defences: Sensing and Surviving Pathogens.

Authors:  Joseph F A Varga; Maxwell P Bui-Marinos; Barbara A Katzenback
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 7.561

2.  Why amphibians are more sensitive than mammals to xenobiotics.

Authors:  Angelo Quaranta; Vito Bellantuono; Giuseppe Cassano; Claudio Lippe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.