Literature DB >> 16519296

Triclosan in a north Texas wastewater treatment plant and the influent and effluent of an experimental constructed wetland.

Elise Lyn Waltman1, Barney J Venables, William T Waller.   

Abstract

The antimicrobial triclosan was analyzed in unfiltered samples from influent, effluent, and receiving stream and before and after a pilot-scale constructed wetland at a North Texas municipal wastewater treatment plant. Triclosan concentrations were reduced by 97 to 99% by the activated sludge treatment plant. Effluent concentrations were further reduced by passage through the constructed wetland, but receiving stream concentrations were not statistically significantly different from effluent concentrations. Effluent concentrations of triclosan were seasonal with highest concentrations occurring during the summer months. The effluent-dominated receiving stream maximum concentrations during summer months were below reported algal no-observed-effect concentrations based on biomass and growth rate but exceeded concentrations reported to cause shifts in algal community structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16519296     DOI: 10.1897/05-112r.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  8 in total

1.  Unit Process Wetlands for Removal of Trace Organic Contaminants and Pathogens from Municipal Wastewater Effluents.

Authors:  Justin T Jasper; Mi T Nguyen; Zackary L Jones; Niveen S Ismail; David L Sedlak; Jonathan O Sharp; Richard G Luthy; Alex J Horne; Kara L Nelson
Journal:  Environ Eng Sci       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.907

2.  Basin-scale emission and multimedia fate of triclosan in whole China.

Authors:  Qian-Qian Zhang; Guang-Guo Ying; Zhi-Feng Chen; Jian-Liang Zhao; You-Sheng Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Occurrence and Fate of Triclosan and Triclocarban in Selected Wastewater Systems across Durban Metropolis, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Authors:  Babatunde Femi Bakare; Gbadebo Clement Adeyinka
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Effects of triclosan and biosolids on microbial community composition in an agricultural soil.

Authors:  Inmyoung Park; Nannan Zhang; Temitope A Ogunyoku; Thomas M Young; Kate M Scow
Journal:  Water Environ Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.946

5.  Environmental Exposure of Aquatic and Terrestrial Biota to Triclosan and Triclocarban.

Authors:  Talia E Chalew; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  J Am Water Works Assoc       Date:  2009

6.  Contribution of Time, Taxonomy, and Selective Antimicrobials to Antibiotic and Multidrug Resistance in Wastewater Bacteria.

Authors:  Hannah K Gray; Keith K Arora-Williams; Charles Young; Edward Bouwer; Meghan F Davis; Sarah P Preheim
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Effects of Stormwater and Snowmelt Runoff on ELISA-EQ Concentrations of PCDD/PCDF and Triclosan in an Urban River.

Authors:  Magdalena Urbaniak; Adrianna Tygielska; Kinga Krauze; Joanna Mankiewicz-Boczek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  On the need and speed of regulating triclosan and triclocarban in the United States.

Authors:  Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 9.028

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.