Literature DB >> 16518836

Towards a better QALY model.

José-María Abellán-Perpiñán1, José-Luis Pinto-Prades, Ildefonso Méndez-Martínez, Xabier Badía-Llach.   

Abstract

This paper presents a test of the predictive validity of various classes of QALY models (i.e. linear, power and exponential models). We first estimated TTO utilities for 43 EQ-5D chronic health states and next these states were embedded in nonchronic health profiles. The chronic TTO utilities were then used to predict the responses to TTO questions with nonchronic health profiles. We find that the power QALY model clearly outperforms linear and exponential QALY models. Optimal power coefficient is 0.65. Our results suggest that TTO-based QALY calculations may be biased. This bias can be corrected using a power QALY model.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16518836     DOI: 10.1002/hec.1095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  10 in total

1.  Critical limb ischemia and its impact on patient health preferences and quality of life-an international study.

Authors:  Giovanni Pisa; Thomas Reinhold; Eliot Obi-Tabot; Maria Bodoria; Bernd Brüggenjürgen
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2012-09

2.  The societal monetary value of a QALY associated with EQ-5D-3L health gains.

Authors:  Laura Vallejo-Torres; Borja García-Lorenzo; Oliver Rivero-Arias; José Luis Pinto-Prades
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2019-11-28

3.  Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: an evaluation of attitudes towards risk and preferences.

Authors:  Jesus Martín-Fernández; Elena Polentinos-Castro; Ma Isabel del Cura-González; Gloria Ariza-Cardiel; Victor Abraira; Ana Isabel Gil-LaCruz; Sonia García-Pérez
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Are preferences over health states informed?

Authors:  M Karimi; J Brazier; S Paisley
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  New findings from the time trade-off for income approach to elicit willingness to pay for a quality adjusted life year.

Authors:  Arthur E Attema; Marieke Krol; Job van Exel; Werner B F Brouwer
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-03-08

6.  Estimating a constant WTP for a QALY-a mission impossible?

Authors:  Björn Sund; Mikael Svensson
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-09-21

7.  Quality-adjusted life year weights and treatment bias: Theory and evidence from cognitive interviews.

Authors:  Bryan N Patenaude; Till Bärnighausen
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2019-06-12

8.  QALYs without bias? Nonparametric correction of time trade-off and standard gamble weights based on prospect theory.

Authors:  Stefan A Lipman; Werner B F Brouwer; Arthur E Attema
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Cost‑Effectiveness Risk‑Aversion Curves: Comparison of Risk-Adjusted Performance Measures and Expected-Utility Approaches.

Authors:  Elamin H Elbasha
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.558

10.  A comparison of individual and collective decision making for standard gamble and time trade-off.

Authors:  Arthur E Attema; Han Bleichrodt; Olivier l'Haridon; Stefan A Lipman
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2020-01-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.