Literature DB >> 16517103

Prediction of in vivo embryotoxic effect levels with a combination of in vitro studies and PBPK modelling.

Miriam Verwei1, Johan A van Burgsteden, Cyrille A M Krul, Johannes J M van de Sandt, Andreas P Freidig.   

Abstract

The new EU legislations for chemicals (Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals, REACH) and cosmetics (Seventh Amendment) stimulate the acceptance of in vitro and in silico approaches to test chemicals for their potential to cause reproductive effects. In the current study seven compounds with known in vivo developmental effects were tested in the embryonic stem cell test (EST). The EST correctly classified 5-fluorouracil, methotrexate, retinoic acid, 2-ethoxyacetic acid and 2-methoxyacetic acid for their in vivo embryotoxic potential. The toxicity of 2-methoxyethanol and 2-ethoxyethanol was underestimated due to a lack of metabolic capacity in the EST. This study further investigated the possibility to use in silico techniques to extrapolate in vitro effect concentrations determined in the EST to in vivo exposure levels. This approach was evaluated by comparing in silico predicted in vivo effect levels with effect levels measured in rodents. The in vivo effect levels of 2-methoxyethanol, 2-ethoxyethanol, methotrexate and retinoic acid were correctly predicted with in silico modelling. Contrary, in vivo embryotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil was overestimated following this approach. It is concluded that a combination of in vitro and in silico techniques appears to be a promising alternative test method for risk assessment of embryotoxic compounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16517103     DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2006.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Lett        ISSN: 0378-4274            Impact factor:   4.372


  12 in total

1.  Incorporating human dosimetry and exposure into high-throughput in vitro toxicity screening.

Authors:  Daniel M Rotroff; Barbara A Wetmore; David J Dix; Stephen S Ferguson; Harvey J Clewell; Keith A Houck; Edward L Lecluyse; Melvin E Andersen; Richard S Judson; Cornelia M Smith; Mark A Sochaski; Robert J Kavlock; Frank Boellmann; Matthew T Martin; David M Reif; John F Wambaugh; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling for absorption, transport, metabolism and excretion.

Authors:  K Sandy Pang; Matthew R Durk
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 3.  Present state and future perspectives of using pluripotent stem cells in toxicology research.

Authors:  Anna M Wobus; Peter Löser
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  The embryonic stem cell test as tool to assess structure-dependent teratogenicity: the case of valproic acid.

Authors:  Christian Riebeling; Ralph Pirow; Klaus Becker; Roland Buesen; Daniel Eikel; Johanna Kaltenhäuser; Frauke Meyer; Heinz Nau; Birgitta Slawik; Anke Visan; Jutta Volland; Horst Spielmann; Andreas Luch; Andrea Seiler
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Human embryonic stem cell-derived test systems for developmental neurotoxicity: a transcriptomics approach.

Authors:  Anne K Krug; Raivo Kolde; John A Gaspar; Eugen Rempel; Nina V Balmer; Kesavan Meganathan; Kinga Vojnits; Mathurin Baquié; Tanja Waldmann; Roberto Ensenat-Waser; Smita Jagtap; Richard M Evans; Stephanie Julien; Hedi Peterson; Dimitra Zagoura; Suzanne Kadereit; Daniel Gerhard; Isaia Sotiriadou; Michael Heke; Karthick Natarajan; Margit Henry; Johannes Winkler; Rosemarie Marchan; Luc Stoppini; Sieto Bosgra; Joost Westerhout; Miriam Verwei; Jaak Vilo; Andreas Kortenkamp; Jürgen Hescheler; Ludwig Hothorn; Susanne Bremer; Christoph van Thriel; Karl-Heinz Krause; Jan G Hengstler; Jörg Rahnenführer; Marcel Leist; Agapios Sachinidis
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  Alternatives to animal testing: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Manfred Liebsch; Barbara Grune; Andrea Seiler; Daniel Butzke; Michael Oelgeschläger; Ralph Pirow; Sarah Adler; Christian Riebeling; Andreas Luch
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  The need for a new toxicity testing and risk analysis paradigm to implement REACH or any other large scale testing initiative.

Authors:  Bas J Blaauboer; Melvin E Andersen
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  Laboratory Rodent Diets Contain Toxic Levels of Environmental Contaminants: Implications for Regulatory Tests.

Authors:  Robin Mesnage; Nicolas Defarge; Louis-Marie Rocque; Joël Spiroux de Vendômois; Gilles-Eric Séralini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Fingerprinting of neurotoxic compounds using a mouse embryonic stem cell dual luminescence reporter assay.

Authors:  Marilena Colaianna; Sten Ilmjärv; Hedi Peterson; Ilse Kern; Stephanie Julien; Mathurin Baquié; Giorgia Pallocca; Sieto Bosgra; Agapios Sachinidis; Jan G Hengstler; Marcel Leist; Karl-Heinz Krause
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 5.153

10.  Investigating the state of physiologically based kinetic modelling practices and challenges associated with gaining regulatory acceptance of model applications.

Authors:  Alicia Paini; Jeremy A Leonard; Tomas Kliment; Yu-Mei Tan; Andrew Worth
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.