Literature DB >> 16516016

200 consecutive hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies: evolution of operative technique and outcomes.

Peter C Fisher1, Jeffery S Montgomery, William K Johnston, J Stuart Wolf.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite the popularity of hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy published experience is less than that with standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and few critical assessments of operative maneuvers have been described.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We describe the impact of changes in operative technique made by a single surgeon during 200 hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies.
RESULTS: With a mean operative time of 229 minutes and hospital stay of 1.9 days the rates of conversion to open surgery, intraoperative complications and major postoperative complications were 1%, 1.5% and 6%, respectively. Lasting changes in technique were dissection of a ureteral/gonadal packet, bipolar cautery use on gonadal/adrenal/lumbar veins and resting the kidney before removal. The incidence of ureteral complications decreased from 8% to 5.1% with dissection of the ureter in conjunction with the gonadal vein rather than isolating it. Warm ischemia time decreased from a mean of 186 to 143 seconds with bipolar electrocautery instead of clips to control gonadal/adrenal/lumbar veins. After starting to rest the kidney before removal the incidence of primary graft nonfunction and delayed function decreased from 6.7% to 0% and 30% to 11.8%, respectively, with a corresponding improvement in 2-year graft survival from 83% to 95%.
CONCLUSIONS: This large series of hand assisted donor laparoscopic nephrectomies with a mean followup approaching 3 years demonstrates that the procedure is safe for the donor and procures a good specimen. Decreases in ureteral complications, warm ischemia time and graft dysfunction might be attributable to specific changes in our operative technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16516016     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00648-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  4 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive donor nephrectomy: current state of the art.

Authors:  Nicole M Shockcor; Sam Sultan; Josue Alvarez-Casas; Philip S Brazio; Michael Phelan; John C LaMattina; Rolf N Barth
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Is right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy right?

Authors:  Mark Sawatzky; Abdulmalik Altaf; James Ellsmere; Dennis Klassen; Mark Walsh; Michele Molinari; Björn Nashan; Jaap Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Donor complications following laparoscopic compared to hand-assisted living donor nephrectomy: an analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Whitney R Halgrimson; Jeffrey Campsen; M Susan Mandell; Mara A Kelly; Igal Kam; Michael A Zimmerman
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2010-01-06

4.  The Mayo Adhesive Probability score can help predict intra- and postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Quentin Franquet; Xavier Matillon; Nicolas Terrier; Jean-Jacques Rambeaud; Sebastien Crouzet; Jean-Alexandre Long; Hakim Fassi-Fehri; Ricardo Codas-Duarte; Delphine Poncet; Thomas Jouve; Johan Noble; Paolo Malvezzi; Lionel Rostaing; Jean-Luc Descotes; Lionel Badet; Gaelle Fiard
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.226

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.