BACKGROUND: No large-scale epidemiological study has included adjustment disorders (AD) for consideration yet it is considered to be a common psychiatric diagnosis. METHODS: Using a two stage screening method, those above a threshold score for possible caseness on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), were interviewed using SCAN to identify those with depressive episode and AD. Variables that might distinguish AD from depressive episode were examined. RESULTS: The prevalence of AD was extremely low with one centre having no cases. Finland, the country with the highest prevalence, only achieved a frequency of 0.8% and 1%, respectively, for urban and rural sites. Logistic regression failed to identify any variables that independently differentiated AD from depressive episode. Findings relating to severity of symptoms using BDI were robust. LIMITATIONS: The small sample size might have contributed to a failure to identify distinguishing features between AD and other disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Reasons for the failure of even robust results, such as BDI severity, to distinguish AD from depressive episode are considered of which problems in conceptualising AD are the most likely. Further studies are required.
BACKGROUND: No large-scale epidemiological study has included adjustment disorders (AD) for consideration yet it is considered to be a common psychiatric diagnosis. METHODS: Using a two stage screening method, those above a threshold score for possible caseness on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), were interviewed using SCAN to identify those with depressive episode and AD. Variables that might distinguish AD from depressive episode were examined. RESULTS: The prevalence of AD was extremely low with one centre having no cases. Finland, the country with the highest prevalence, only achieved a frequency of 0.8% and 1%, respectively, for urban and rural sites. Logistic regression failed to identify any variables that independently differentiated AD from depressive episode. Findings relating to severity of symptoms using BDI were robust. LIMITATIONS: The small sample size might have contributed to a failure to identify distinguishing features between AD and other disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Reasons for the failure of even robust results, such as BDI severity, to distinguish AD from depressive episode are considered of which problems in conceptualising AD are the most likely. Further studies are required.
Authors: Andreas Maercker; Simon Forstmeier; Laura Pielmaier; Lena Spangenberg; Elmar Brähler; Heide Glaesmer Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2012-03-11 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: L R Cornelius; S Brouwer; M R de Boer; J W Groothoff; J J L van der Klink Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2014-01-30 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Sarah L Minden; Anthony Feinstein; Rosalind C Kalb; Deborah Miller; David C Mohr; Scott B Patten; Christopher Bever; Randolph B Schiffer; Gary S Gronseth; Pushpa Narayanaswami Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-12-27 Impact factor: 9.910