Literature DB >> 16515143

Speech recognition in multitalker babble using digits, words, and sentences.

Rachel A McArdle1, Richard H Wilson, Christopher A Burks.   

Abstract

The purpose of this mixed model design was to examine recognition performance differences when measuring speech recognition in multitalker babble on listeners with normal hearing (n = 36) and listeners with hearing loss (n = 72) utilizing stimulus of varying linguistic complexity (digits, words, and sentence materials). All listeners were administered two trials of two lists of each material in a descending speech-to-babble ratio. For each of the materials, recognition performances by the listeners with normal hearing were significantly better than the performances by the listeners with hearing loss. The mean separation between groups at the 50% point in signal-to-babble ratio on each of the three materials was approximately 8 dB. The 50% points for digits were obtained at a significantly lower signal-to-babble ratio than for sentences or words that were equivalent. There were no interlist differences between the two lists for the digits and words, but there was a significant disparity between QuickSIN lists for the listeners with hearing loss. A two-item questionnaire was used to obtain a subjective measurement of speech recognition, which showed moderate correlations with objective measures of speech recognition in noise using digits (r = .641), sentences (r = .572), and words (r = .673).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16515143     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.16.9.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  9 in total

1.  Right-Ear Advantage for Speech-in-Noise Recognition in Patients with Nonlateralized Tinnitus and Normal Hearing Sensitivity.

Authors:  Yihsin Tai; Fatima T Husain
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-11-27

2.  A right-ear bias of auditory selective attention is evident in alpha oscillations.

Authors:  Lisa Payne; Chad S Rogers; Arthur Wingfield; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Auditory and Cognitive Factors Associated with Speech-in-Noise Complaints following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Eric C Hoover; Pamela E Souza; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Amplitude modulation detection with a short-duration carrier: Effects of a precursor and hearing loss.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Jessica Chen; Sara E Fultz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Jayne B Ahlstrom; Amy R Horwitz; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  Variations in the slope of the psychometric functions for speech intelligibility: a systematic survey.

Authors:  Alexandra MacPherson; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Factors Underlying Individual Differences in Speech-Recognition Threshold (SRT) in Noise Among Older Adults.

Authors:  Larry E Humes
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 5.750

8.  On the Difference of Scoring in Speech in Babble Tests.

Authors:  Afroditi Sereti; Christos Sidiras; Nikos Eleftheriadis; Ioannis Nimatoudis; Gail D Chermak; Vasiliki Maria Iliadou
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-28

9.  Spoken Word Recognition Enhancement Due to Preceding Synchronized Beats Compared to Unsynchronized or Unrhythmic Beats.

Authors:  Christos Sidiras; Vasiliki Iliadou; Ioannis Nimatoudis; Tobias Reichenbach; Doris-Eva Bamiou
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.