Lea Sorensen1, Lynda Molyneaux, Dennis K Yue. 1. Diabetes Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney, Australia Discipline of Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia. lea@email.cs.nsw.gov.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether small nerve fiber dysfunction predicts pain in diabetic neuropathy using quantitative sensory testing of thermal thresholds. METHODS: Diabetic patients with or without painful neuropathy (n=191) were studied. Small nerve fiber function was assessed by quantitative sensory testing of cold detection and heat pain thresholds. Subjects were also categorized as being hyperalgesic (<10th percentile) or hyposensitive (>90th percentile) by comparing with normative data. Vibration perception threshold, a large nerve fiber function, was measured using a biothesiometer (Bio-medical Instrument, Newbury, OH). RESULTS: In the patients with pain, cold stimulus was detected after a greater reduction in temperature from baseline (-3.7 degrees C vs. -0.6 in the no-pain group, P<0.0001). There were no differences between the pain and painless groups in the heat pain tests, with hyperalgesia noted in about 60% of subjects. Vibration perception threshold and loss of ankle reflexes were significant determinants of pain, but together they accounted for only 6.8% of the variance. If these were removed from the model, cold detection threshold became a significant determinant of pain but accounted for only 3.0% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative sensory testing of small nerve fiber function is a useful test to detect the presence of neuropathy, and overall diabetic patients with neuropathic pain have more sensory loss. However, small nerve fiber abnormalities detected by quantitative sensory testing do not predict the presence of pain in diabetic neuropathy.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether small nerve fiber dysfunction predicts pain in diabetic neuropathy using quantitative sensory testing of thermal thresholds. METHODS:Diabeticpatients with or without painful neuropathy (n=191) were studied. Small nerve fiber function was assessed by quantitative sensory testing of cold detection and heat pain thresholds. Subjects were also categorized as being hyperalgesic (<10th percentile) or hyposensitive (>90th percentile) by comparing with normative data. Vibration perception threshold, a large nerve fiber function, was measured using a biothesiometer (Bio-medical Instrument, Newbury, OH). RESULTS: In the patients with pain, cold stimulus was detected after a greater reduction in temperature from baseline (-3.7 degrees C vs. -0.6 in the no-pain group, P<0.0001). There were no differences between the pain and painless groups in the heat pain tests, with hyperalgesia noted in about 60% of subjects. Vibration perception threshold and loss of ankle reflexes were significant determinants of pain, but together they accounted for only 6.8% of the variance. If these were removed from the model, cold detection threshold became a significant determinant of pain but accounted for only 3.0% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative sensory testing of small nerve fiber function is a useful test to detect the presence of neuropathy, and overall diabeticpatients with neuropathic pain have more sensory loss. However, small nerve fiber abnormalities detected by quantitative sensory testing do not predict the presence of pain in diabetic neuropathy.
Authors: Hsinlin T Cheng; Jacqueline R Dauch; John M Hayes; Brandon M Yanik; Eva L Feldman Journal: Neurobiol Dis Date: 2011-08-18 Impact factor: 5.996
Authors: Hsinlin T Cheng; Jacqueline R Dauch; Michael T Porzio; Brandon M Yanik; Wilson Hsieh; A Gordon Smith; J Robinson Singleton; Eva L Feldman Journal: J Pain Date: 2013-05-17 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Albert Dahan; Ann Dunne; Maarten Swartjes; Paolo L Proto; Lara Heij; Oscar Vogels; Monique van Velzen; Elise Sarton; Marieke Niesters; Martijn R Tannemaat; Anthony Cerami; Michael Brines Journal: Mol Med Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 6.354