BACKGROUND:Urban minority groups, such as those living in northern Manhattan and the South Bronx, are generally underserved with regard to breast cancer prevention and screening practices. Primary care physicians are critical for the recommendation of mammography and clinical breast examinations to their patients. DESIGN:Two medically underserved communities were matched and block randomized. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of academic detailing in increasing recommendations for breast cancer screening in community-based primary care physicians. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-four primary care community-based (ie, not hospital-based) physicians in northern Manhattan were compared with 74 physicians in the South Bronx who received no intervention. INTERVENTION: INTERVENTION participants received multicomponent physician-directed education, academic detailing, using the American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of breast cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We administered interviews to ask about primary care physicians' recommendation of mammography and clinical breast examination. They were also queried about their knowledge of major risk factors and perceived barriers to breast cancer screening. We conducted medical audits of 710 medical charts 2 years before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Using a mixed models linear analysis, we found a statistically significant intervention effect on the recommendation of mammography and clinical breast examination (according to medical audit) by female patients age 40 and over. INTERVENTION group physicians correctly identified significantly more risk factors for breast cancer, and significantly fewer barriers to practice, than did comparison physicians. CONCLUSIONS: We found some evidence of improvement in breast cancer screening practices due to academic detailing among primary care physicians practicing in urban underserved communities.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Urban minority groups, such as those living in northern Manhattan and the South Bronx, are generally underserved with regard to breast cancer prevention and screening practices. Primary care physicians are critical for the recommendation of mammography and clinical breast examinations to their patients. DESIGN: Two medically underserved communities were matched and block randomized. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of academic detailing in increasing recommendations for breast cancer screening in community-based primary care physicians. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-four primary care community-based (ie, not hospital-based) physicians in northern Manhattan were compared with 74 physicians in the South Bronx who received no intervention. INTERVENTION: INTERVENTION participants received multicomponent physician-directed education, academic detailing, using the American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of breast cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We administered interviews to ask about primary care physicians' recommendation of mammography and clinical breast examination. They were also queried about their knowledge of major risk factors and perceived barriers to breast cancer screening. We conducted medical audits of 710 medical charts 2 years before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Using a mixed models linear analysis, we found a statistically significant intervention effect on the recommendation of mammography and clinical breast examination (according to medical audit) by female patients age 40 and over. INTERVENTION group physicians correctly identified significantly more risk factors for breast cancer, and significantly fewer barriers to practice, than did comparison physicians. CONCLUSIONS: We found some evidence of improvement in breast cancer screening practices due to academic detailing among primary care physicians practicing in urban underserved communities.
Authors: Judith K Ockene; Karen M Ashe; Rashelle B Hayes; Linda C Churchill; Sybil L Crawford; Alan C Geller; Denise Jolicoeur; Barbara C Olendzki; Maria Theresa Basco; Jyothi A Pendharkar; Kristi J Ferguson; Thomas P Guck; Katherine L Margo; Catherine A Okuliar; Monica A Shaw; Taraneh Soleymani; Diane D Stadler; Sarita S Warrier; Lori Pbert Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Judith K Ockene; Rashelle B Hayes; Linda C Churchill; Sybil L Crawford; Denise G Jolicoeur; David M Murray; Abigail B Shoben; Sean P David; Kristi J Ferguson; Kathryn N Huggett; Michael Adams; Catherine A Okuliar; Robin L Gross; Pat F Bass; Ruth B Greenberg; Frank T Leone; Kola S Okuyemi; David W Rudy; Jonathan B Waugh; Alan C Geller Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: William J Curry; Eugene J Lengerich; Brenda C Kluhsman; Marie A Graybill; Jason Z Liao; Eric W Schaefer; Angela M Spleen; Mark B Dignan Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2011-05-23 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Rashelle B Hayes; Alan Geller; Linda Churchill; Denise Jolicoeur; David M Murray; Abigail Shoben; Sean P David; Michael Adams; Kola Okuyemi; Randy Fauver; Robin Gross; Frank Leone; Rui Xiao; Jonathan Waugh; Sybil Crawford; Judith K Ockene Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2014-01-31 Impact factor: 2.226