Literature DB >> 16513464

Hard palate and free tarsal grafts as posterior lamella substitutes in upper lid surgery.

Igal Leibovitch1, Raman Malhotra, Dinesh Selva.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To present the surgical outcomes and postoperative complications in a series of patients who underwent upper lid surgery using autogenous hard palate grafts (HPGs) or free tarsal grafts (FTGs) as posterior lamella replacement material.
DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative, interventional case series. PATIENTS: Thirty-one consecutive patients who were operated in 2 oculoplastics centers between July 2000 and January 2005.
METHODS: All patients' clinical records were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative upper eyelid contour and viability, ocular discomfort, keratopathy, and corneal edema, as well as assessment for donor site complications and final graft dimensions.
RESULTS: There were 31 patients who underwent upper lid surgery (15 HPGs, 16 FTGs). The complications in the HPG group included corneal edema or transient keratopathy (13.3%), partial graft dehiscence (13.3%), upper lid retraction (13.3%), and necrosis of the overlying skin flap (6.7%). There were no significant postoperative complications in the FTG group during a mean follow-up period of 13.5+/-5 months. Donor site complications included 2 cases of mild upper lid retraction and central peaking. There were an average of 17% decrease in FTG vertical height and a 24% decrease in HPG vertical height during the follow-up period.
CONCLUSION: Hard palate grafts may be associated with a higher rate of complications in upper lid surgery relative to FTGs, although most complications are temporary. Graft contraction could be reduced by oversizing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16513464     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  8 in total

1.  Pedicled lower lid-sharing flap for full-thickness reconstruction of the upper eyelid.

Authors:  Y C Wang; H Y Dai; X Xing; C Lv; J Zhu; C Y Xue
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  Ocular Adnexal Reconstruction for Cutaneous Periocular Malignancies.

Authors:  Alison B Huggins; Michelle W Latting; Douglas P Marx; Joseph N Giacometti
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  [Transplants from the hard palate: method for mucosal graft reconstruction of the upper eyelid].

Authors:  M Emesz; E M Krall; M Rasp; F M Bauer; G Grabner; E M Arlt
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Reconstructive options for the medial canthus and eyelids following tumor excision.

Authors:  Craig N Czyz; Kenneth V Cahill; Jill A Foster; Kevin S Michels; Cooper M Clark; Nicole E Rich
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10-13

5.  Reconstructive Surgery of the Upper Eyelid Using the Residual Tarsus after Excision of Sebaceous Gland Carcinoma.

Authors:  Tatsuya Yunoki; Yasuhisa Nakamura; Chiharu Fuchizawa; Atsushi Hayashi
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-28

6.  Reconstruction of Upper Eyelid Defects Secondary to Malignant Tumors with a Newly Modified Cutler-Beard Technique with Tarsoconjunctival Graft.

Authors:  Álvaro Bengoa-González; Bianca Ma Laslău; Agustín Martín-Clavijo; Enrique Mencía-Gutiérrez; Ma Dolores Lago-Llinás
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  Reconstruction of total upper eyelid defects using a myocutaneous advancement flap and a composite contralateral upper eyelid tarsus and hard palate grafts.

Authors:  Wendy W Lee; Oded Ohana; Dimitra M Portaliou; Benjamin P Erickson; Mohamed S Sayed; David T Tse
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2021-02-05

8.  Revisiting the single-eyelid hughes reconstruction - A report of two cases.

Authors:  Spencer Harris; Rona Z Silkiss
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2022-07-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.