Literature DB >> 16513226

Starch microparticles as a vaccine adjuvant: only uptake in Peyer's patches decides the profile of the immune response.

Linda Stertman1, Ebba Lundgren, Ingvar Sjöholm.   

Abstract

Starch microparticles, an effective adjuvant for oral vaccination in mice, are taken up over the follicle-associated epithelium (FAE) in Peyer's patches when human serum albumin is conjugated to the particles (HSAmp). When recombinant cholera toxin B subunit (rCTBmp) is conjugated, they are taken up over both the FAE and the villus epithelium. This study investigated the effects of the different targeting on the immune response by using particles with both HSA and rCTB (HSA/rCTBmp). The response induced after oral immunisation with this formulation in mice was compared with that obtained after administration of HSAmp, rCTBmp or both given concomitantly (HSAmp+rCTBmp) and after subcutaneous administration. Both the HSA- and rCTB-specific responses were followed quantitatively (as assessed by the anti-[IgM+IgG] level, the s-IgA response and the delayed-type hypersensitivity [DTH] response), or qualitatively (by the IgG subclass profile). After subcutaneous administration, the rCTB-specific IgM+IgG and DTH responses were lower after HSA/rCTBmp than after rCTBmp and the HSA-specific subclass ratio (IgG1/IgG2a+IgG2b) was lower with HSAmp+rCTBmp (but not with HSA/rCTBmp) compared to HSAmp. However, no quantitative and qualitative differences in the immune response after oral administration were detected when rCTB was added to HSAmp. The results indicate that only the uptake over the Peyer's patches decides the immune responses after oral administration and that the increased targeting to GM1 receptors of the villus epithelium does not affect the immune response. Moreover, the qualitative Th1/Th2-balance is controlled by the inherent properties of the antigens in the microparticles upon subcutaneous administration. Thus, the obtained information is important for designing oral microparticulate vaccines in order to obtain the wanted immune response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16513226     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.10.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  7 in total

Review 1.  Mucosal vaccines: recent progress in understanding the natural barriers.

Authors:  Olga Borges; Filipa Lebre; Dulce Bento; Gerrit Borchard; Hans E Junginger
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Demystifying particle-based oral vaccines.

Authors:  Pedro Gonzalez-Cruz; Harvinder Singh Gill
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 8.129

Review 3.  Properties and applications of nanoparticle/microparticle conveyors with adjuvant characteristics suitable for oral vaccination.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Wendi Yang; Chaohua Hu; Qianchao Wang; Yunkun Wu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-05-21

4.  Transgenic papaya: a useful platform for oral vaccines.

Authors:  Gladis Fragoso; Marisela Hernández; Jacquelynne Cervantes-Torres; Rubén Ramírez-Aquino; Héctor Chapula; Nelly Villalobos; René Segura-Velázquez; Alfredo Figueroa; Iván Flores; Herminio Jiménez; Laura Adalid; Gabriela Rosas; Luis Galvez; Elias Pezzat; Elizabeth Monreal-Escalante; Sergio Rosales-Mendoza; Luis G Vazquez; Edda Sciutto
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  The mucosal adjuvant potential of cross-linked dextran microspheres as dry powder.

Authors:  Mohsen Tafaghodi; Maryam Eskandari
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.699

6.  Scaffolded Antigens in Yeast Cell Particle Vaccines Provide Protection against Systemic Polyoma Virus Infection.

Authors:  Donald J Tipper; Eva Szomolanyi-Tsuda
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 4.818

7.  Plant-derived protein bodies as delivery vehicles for recombinant proteins into mammalian cells.

Authors:  Jennifer Schwestka; Marc Tschofen; Stefan Vogt; Sylvain Marcel; Johannes Grillari; Marianne Raith; Ines Swoboda; Eva Stoger
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 4.395

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.