Literature DB >> 16512656

Cervical spine trauma in children: a review.

Todd McCall1, Dan Fassett, Douglas Brockmeyer.   

Abstract

Injuries of the cervical spine are relatively rare in children but are a distinct clinical entity compared with those found in adults. The unique biomechanics of the pediatric cervical spine lead to a different distribution of injuries and distinct radiographic features. Children younger than 9 years of age usually have upper cervical injuries, whereas older children, whose biomechanics more closely resemble those of adults, are prone to lower cervical injuries. Pediatric cervical injuries are more frequently ligamentous in nature, and children are also more prone to spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality than adults are. Physical injuries are specific only to children. Radiographically benign findings, such as pseudosubluxation and synchondrosis, can be mistaken for traumatic injuries. External immobilization with a halo brace can be difficult and is associated with a high complication rate because of the thin calvaria in children. Surgical options have improved with the development of instrumentation specifically for children, but special considerations exist, such as the small size and growth potential of the pediatric spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16512656     DOI: 10.3171/foc.2006.20.2.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  25 in total

1.  Special considerations in the interpretation of plain radiographs of the cervical spine in children. A review of the literature.

Authors:  C Schöneberg; B Schweiger; S Lendemans; C Waydhas
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Rare case of survival after traumatic disruption of the cervical spine with combined complete spinal cord injury and bilateral vertebral arterial breakdown in an 18-month-old patient.

Authors:  Takuji Matsumoto; Mamoru Kawakami; Muneharu Ando; Munehito Yoshida
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-04-22

3.  Junctional susceptibility of the pediatric spine: a case report.

Authors:  Oliver Flouty; Kingsley Abode-Iyamah; Raheel Ahmed; Saul Wilson; Arnold H Menezes
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Highly unstable cervical spine injury in an infant: a case report.

Authors:  Sue young Ha; Sun-Ho Lee; Eun-Sang Kim; Hyung Jin Shin; Whan Eoh
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  A retrospective comparison of CT and MRI in detecting pediatric cervical spine injury.

Authors:  Mark Henry; Ron I Riesenburger; James Kryzanski; Andrew Jea; Steven W Hwang
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 6.  Severe spinal cord injury in craniocervical dislocation. Case-based update.

Authors:  Juan F Martínez-Lage; Fernando Alarcón; Raul Alfaro; Amparo Gilabert; Susana B Reyes; María-José Almagro; Antonio López López-Guerrero
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  [Atypical dislocated dens fracture type II with rotational atlantoaxial luxation after a riding accident].

Authors:  S Hopf; R Buchalla; H Elhöft; O Rubarth; W Börm
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Occult injury of the pediatric craniocervical junction.

Authors:  Joseph J Junewick; Indu R Meesa; Charles R Luttenton; Jeffrey M Hinman
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-04-25

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based relationships between neck muscle cross-sectional area and neck circumference for adults and children.

Authors:  Renée M Dawson; Zahid Latif; E Mark Haacke; John M Cavanaugh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Developmental biomechanics of neck musculature.

Authors:  Amy V Lavallee; Randal P Ching; David J Nuckley
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-11-03       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.