Literature DB >> 16512601

Immunohistochemistry in diagnostic surgical pathology of the prostate.

Omar Hameed1, Peter A Humphrey.   

Abstract

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) can play an important role in diagnostic surgical pathology of the prostate. Basal cell markers, such as the 34betaE12 antibody and antibodies directed against cytokeratin 5 and 6 or p63, are very useful for demonstration of basal cells as their presence argues against a diagnosis of invasive prostatic carcinoma (PC). However, several benign mimickers of PC, including atrophy, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), nephrogenic adenoma, and mesonephric hyperplasia, can stain negatively with these markers, and thus, a negative basal cell marker immunostain alone does not exclude a diagnosis of benignancy. Although there are examples in the literature of high grade PC that stain focally with some of the basal cell markers, these cases are usually readily diagnosed based on H&E appearances and are unlikely to be confused with these benign mimickers. Alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme-A racemase (AMACR) is a sensitive marker of PC (except for a few uncommon variants: atrophic, foamy gland, and pseudohyperplastic variants), and its detection by immunohistochemical staining in atypical prostatic lesions can be very useful in confirming an impression of adenocarcinoma. AMACR expression can also be identified in high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), prostatic atrophy, AAH, and benign prostatic glands, and accordingly, a diagnosis of PC should not be based solely on a positive AMACR immunostain, especially when the luminal staining is weak and/or noncircumferential. The use of AMACR/basal cell antibody cocktails has been found to greatly facilitate the distinction between PC and its benign mimickers, especially when only limited tissue is available for staining. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) and prostate specific acid phosphatase (PSAP) are both quite sensitive and fairly specific markers of PC (there are a few nonprostatic tumors that can express one or both), and are both very helpful in establishing or confirming the diagnosis of PC when the differential diagnosis includes other tumors that can involve the prostate such as urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma. 34betaE12, p63, thrombomodulin, and uroplakin III are additional urothelial associated markers useful in this differential diagnosis. CDX2 and villin are useful markers to diagnostically separate colonic adenocarcinoma from PC. AMACR positivity and negative basal cell marker reactions are useful to confirm the presence of residual PC after hormonal or radiation therapy. Pan-cytokeratin, PSA, and PSAP can also highlight subtle infiltrates of PC with hormonal or radiation therapy effect. PSA and PSAP immunohistochemical stains are valuable in confirming metastatic carcinoma as being of prostatic origin and should always be utilized in the diagnostic evaluation of metastatic adenocarcinoma of unknown primary origin in males.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16512601     DOI: 10.1053/j.semdp.2005.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol        ISSN: 0740-2570            Impact factor:   3.464


  24 in total

1.  NKX3.1 as a marker of prostatic origin in metastatic tumors.

Authors:  Bora Gurel; Tehmina Z Ali; Elizabeth A Montgomery; Shahnaz Begum; Jessica Hicks; Michael Goggins; Charles G Eberhart; Douglas P Clark; Charles J Bieberich; Jonathan I Epstein; Angelo M De Marzo
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 2.  What is the pathologist saying? Interpretation of the prostate pathology report.

Authors:  Omar Hameed
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Differentiating rectal carcinoma by an immunohistological analysis of carcinomas of pelvic organs based on the NCBI Literature Survey and the Human Protein Atlas database.

Authors:  Koh Miura; Kazuyuki Ishida; Wataru Fujibuchi; Akihiro Ito; Hitoshi Niikura; Hitoshi Ogawa; Iwao Sasaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 4.  Diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in prostate needle biopsy tissue.

Authors:  P A Humphrey
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Lipid metabolism in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Xinyu Wu; Garrett Daniels; Peng Lee; Marie E Monaco
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2014-07-12

6.  The transcription factor MIST1 is a novel human gastric chief cell marker whose expression is lost in metaplasia, dysplasia, and carcinoma.

Authors:  Jochen K M Lennerz; Seok-Hyung Kim; Edward L Oates; Won Jae Huh; Jason M Doherty; Xiaolin Tian; Andrew J Bredemeyer; James R Goldenring; Gregory Y Lauwers; Young-Kee Shin; Jason C Mills
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 4.307

7.  Anti-glutamate receptor 2 as a new potential diagnostic probe for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a pilot immunohistochemical study.

Authors:  Jaclyn F Hechtman; Guang Q Xiao; Pamela D Unger; Yayoi Kinoshita; James H Godbold; David E Burstein
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2012-07

Review 8.  Histopathology of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Peter A Humphrey
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 6.915

9.  Guidelines on processing and reporting of prostate biopsies: the 2013 update of the pathology committee of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).

Authors:  T Van der Kwast; L Bubendorf; C Mazerolles; M R Raspollini; G J Van Leenders; C-G Pihl; P Kujala
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  AMACR expression in colorectal cancer is associated with left-sided tumor localization.

Authors:  Andreas Marx; Philipp Simon; Ronald Simon; Martina Mirlacher; Jakob R Izbicki; Emre Yekebas; Jussuf T Kaifi; Luigi Terracciano; Guido Sauter
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.