Literature DB >> 1651171

S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function.

M A Hoyt1, L Totis, B T Roberts.   

Abstract

We have identified mutant strains of S. cerevisiae that fail to properly arrest their cell cycles at mitosis in response to the loss of microtubule function. New bud emergence and DNA replication (but not cytokinesis) occur with high efficiency in the mutants under conditions that inhibit these events in wild-type cells. The inability to halt cell cycle progression is specific for impaired microtubule function; the mutants respond normally to other cell cycle-blocking treatments. Under microtubule-disrupting conditions, the mutants neither achieve nor maintain the high level of histone H1 kinase activity characteristic of wild-type cells. Our studies have defined three genes required for normal cell cycle arrest. These findings are consistent with the existence of a surveillance system that halts the cell cycle in response to microtubule perturbation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1651171     DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90014-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  449 in total

1.  Genetic instability and the mutator phenotype. Studies in ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  K R Loeb; L A Loeb
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2.  Control of mitotic transitions by the anaphase-promoting complex.

Authors:  G Fang; H Yu; M W Kirschner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Chromosomal instability syndrome of total premature chromatid separation with mosaic variegated aneuploidy is defective in mitotic-spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  S Matsuura; E Ito; H Tauchi; K Komatsu; T Ikeuchi; T Kajii
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-06-30       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Mad2 binding to Mad1 and Cdc20, rather than oligomerization, is required for the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  L Sironi; M Melixetian; M Faretta; E Prosperini; K Helin; A Musacchio
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 5.  Evidence that replication fork components catalyze establishment of cohesion between sister chromatids.

Authors:  D R Carson; M F Christman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Fission yeast ch-TOG/XMAP215 homologue Alp14 connects mitotic spindles with the kinetochore and is a component of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  M A Garcia; L Vardy; N Koonrugsa; T Toda
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-07-02       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Identification of an overlapping binding domain on Cdc20 for Mad2 and anaphase-promoting complex: model for spindle checkpoint regulation.

Authors:  Y Zhang; E Lees
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Checkpoint protein BubR1 acts synergistically with Mad2 to inhibit anaphase-promoting complex.

Authors:  Guowei Fang
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.138

9.  Visualization of Mad2 dynamics at kinetochores, along spindle fibers, and at spindle poles in living cells.

Authors:  B J Howell; D B Hoffman; G Fang; A W Murray; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2000-09-18       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Bub3 gene disruption in mice reveals essential mitotic spindle checkpoint function during early embryogenesis.

Authors:  P Kalitsis; E Earle; K J Fowler; K H Choo
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.