BACKGROUND: Early pathological involvement of specific medial temporal lobe areas is characteristic for Alzheimer's disease (AD). OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of regional medial temporal lobe atrophy, including hippocampus, amygdala, and entorhinal, perirhinal, and parahippocampal cortices in mild AD patients and healthy controls, and to compare diagnostic accuracy across volumetric markers. METHODS: We studied 34 patients with clinically probable AD and 22 healthy elderly control subjects. Regional volumetric measures were obtained from volumetric T1-weighted MRI scans after accounting for global brain atrophy using affine transformation into standard space. RESULTS: Volumes of medial temporal lobe structures were significantly smaller in AD patients than in controls with exception of the left entorhinal cortex. The degree of atrophy was comparable between all structures. Diagnostic accuracy (number of correctly allocated cases divided by number of all cases) was highest for the right parahippocampal cortex with 85%, but only slightly lower for the right hippocampus and right entorhinal cortex with 82% and 84%. Using a linear combination of markers, the unilateral volumes of the right hippocampus, parahippocampal cortex and perirhinal cortex yielded an accuracy of 93%. CONCLUSION: Extent of atrophy is similar between the different regions of the medial temporal lobe in mild AD.Volume measurements of medial temporal lobe structures in addition to the hippocampus only yield improved diagnostic accuracy if a combination of these structures is used.
BACKGROUND: Early pathological involvement of specific medial temporal lobe areas is characteristic for Alzheimer's disease (AD). OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of regional medial temporal lobe atrophy, including hippocampus, amygdala, and entorhinal, perirhinal, and parahippocampal cortices in mild ADpatients and healthy controls, and to compare diagnostic accuracy across volumetric markers. METHODS: We studied 34 patients with clinically probable AD and 22 healthy elderly control subjects. Regional volumetric measures were obtained from volumetric T1-weighted MRI scans after accounting for global brain atrophy using affine transformation into standard space. RESULTS: Volumes of medial temporal lobe structures were significantly smaller in ADpatients than in controls with exception of the left entorhinal cortex. The degree of atrophy was comparable between all structures. Diagnostic accuracy (number of correctly allocated cases divided by number of all cases) was highest for the right parahippocampal cortex with 85%, but only slightly lower for the right hippocampus and right entorhinal cortex with 82% and 84%. Using a linear combination of markers, the unilateral volumes of the right hippocampus, parahippocampal cortex and perirhinal cortex yielded an accuracy of 93%. CONCLUSION: Extent of atrophy is similar between the different regions of the medial temporal lobe in mild AD.Volume measurements of medial temporal lobe structures in addition to the hippocampus only yield improved diagnostic accuracy if a combination of these structures is used.
Authors: M Bobinski; M J de Leon; A Convit; S De Santi; J Wegiel; C Y Tarshish; L A Saint Louis; H M Wisniewski Journal: Lancet Date: 1999-01-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: C R Jack; M Slomkowski; S Gracon; T M Hoover; J P Felmlee; K Stewart; Y Xu; M Shiung; P C O'Brien; R Cha; D Knopman; R C Petersen Journal: Neurology Date: 2003-01-28 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: C R Jack; R C Petersen; Y C Xu; S C Waring; P C O'Brien; E G Tangalos; G E Smith; R J Ivnik; E Kokmen Journal: Neurology Date: 1997-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: M P Laakso; G B Frisoni; M Könönen; M Mikkonen; A Beltramello; C Geroldi; A Bianchetti; M Trabucchi; H Soininen; H J Aronen Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2000-06-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: J C Morris; A Heyman; R C Mohs; J P Hughes; G van Belle; G Fillenbaum; E D Mellits; C Clark Journal: Neurology Date: 1989-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Klaus H Fritzsche; Bram Stieltjes; Sarah Schlindwein; Thomas van Bruggen; Marco Essig; Hans-Peter Meinzer Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2010-05-04 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Ying Wu; Ann B Ragin; Hongyan Du; Shawn Sidharthan; Eugene E Dunkle; Ioannis Koktzoglou; Robert R Edelman Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: R Scott Mackin; J Craig Nelson; Kevin L Delucchi; Patrick J Raue; Derek D Satre; Dimitris N Kiosses; George S Alexopoulos; Patricia A Arean Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Matthew A Warner; Teddy S Youn; Tommy Davis; Alvin Chandra; Carlos Marquez de la Plata; Carol Moore; Caryn Harper; Christopher J Madden; Jeffrey Spence; Roderick McColl; Michael Devous; Richard D King; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2010-07-12
Authors: Lei Cao; Hui-Fu Wang; Lin Tan; Fu-Rong Sun; Meng-Shan Tan; Chen-Chen Tan; Teng Jiang; Jin-Tai Yu; Lan Tan Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-03-22
Authors: Stefan J Teipel; Thomas Meindl; Lea Grinberg; Helmut Heinsen; Harald Hampel Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Christine Fennema-Notestine; Linda K McEvoy; Donald J Hagler; Mark W Jacobson; Anders M Dale Journal: Behav Neurol Date: 2009 Impact factor: 3.342