Literature DB >> 16511208

Structure of the SARS coronavirus main proteinase as an active C2 crystallographic dimer.

Ting Xu1, Amy Ooi, Hooi Chen Lee, Rupert Wilmouth, Ding Xiang Liu, Julien Lescar.   

Abstract

The 34 kDa main proteinase (Mpro) from the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) plays an important role in the virus life cycle through the specific processing of viral polyproteins. As such, SARS-CoV Mpro is a key target for the identification of specific inhibitors directed against the SARS virus. With a view to facilitating the development of such compounds, crystals were obtained of the enzyme at pH 6.5 in the orthorhombic space group P2(1)2(1)2 that diffract to a resolution of 1.9 A. These crystals contain one monomer per asymmetric unit and the biologically active dimer is generated via the crystallographic twofold axis. The conformation of the catalytic site indicates that the enzyme is active in the crystalline form and thus suitable for structure-based inhibition studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16511208      PMCID: PMC1978130          DOI: 10.1107/S1744309105033257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun        ISSN: 1744-3091


Introduction

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a severe form of pneumonia. Its transmission pattern, high mortality rate and possible re-emergence in the future make SARS a serious threat for which neither efficient therapy nor vaccine is currently available. The disease is caused by a member of the coronavirus family: the SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV; Fouchier et al., 2003 ▶). Following viral entry into cells, two polyproteins named pp1a and pp1ab, with molecular weights of 486 and 790 kDa, respectively, are synthesized (Rota et al., 2003 ▶). During the viral life cycle, pp1a and pp1ab are processed into 15 putative non-structural proteins by two viral proteases: the papain-like protease and the main proteinase Mpro (also named the 3C-like protease; 3CLpro; reviewed in Ziebuhr et al., 2000 ▶). In SARS-CoV, Mpro is responsible for the cleavage of 11 sites in the replicase polyproteins (Snijder et al., 2003 ▶), releasing viral enzymes needed for replication, such as the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and the helicase, as well as other accessory proteins and non-structural proteins the functions of which are not fully understood. Thus, given its pivotal role in the viral life cycle, Mpro is an attractive target for the development of drugs directed against the SARS virus. Three-dimensional structures of Mpro enzymes have been reported for several coronaviruses including human CoV (HCoV229E; Anand et al., 2003 ▶), porcine transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV; Anand et al., 2002 ▶) and SARS-CoV (Yang et al., 2003 ▶). In this study, using an Escherichia coli overexpression system, we purified the SARS-CoV Mpro and obtained a novel crystal form at pH 6.5 that diffracts to high resolution and contains one monomer per asymmetric unit. The active-site residues and the oxyanion hole adopt a functional conformation, indicating that this crystal form might be useful for structure-based drug design.

Experimental

Protein expression and purification

The DNA fragment encoding the SARS-CoV Mpro strain SIN 2774 (Ruan et al., 2003 ▶) was amplified by PCR using Pfu polymerase (Stratagene) and cloned into pMAL-c2x (New England Biolabs) incorporating the maltose-binding protein (MBP) at the N-terminus of SARS-CoV Mpro. The forward primer (5′-TACTAATTGAAGGAGTTCGGGTTTTAGGAAAATGG-3′) contains an XmnI site (bold). The reverse primer (5′-AGCCGGATCCTTATTGGAAGGTAACACCAG-3′) contains a BamHI site (bold) downstream of the stop codon TAA. Four additional amino acids (IEGR) were introduced to facilitate the removal of MBP by factor Xa. Transformed BL21(DE3) E. coli cells were grown at 310 K in LB media supplemented with 0.2% glucose until an OD600nm of 0.6–0.8 was attained. IPTG was added to a final concentration of 1 mM and the temperature was lowered to 303 K. After 2 h, cells were harvested by centrifugation at 8000g for 10 min, resuspended in buffer A (20 mM TrisHCl pH 7.4, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA) and lysed by sonication for 20 min, followed by centrifugation at 20 000g for 20 min at 277 K. The supernatant was loaded onto an Econo-column (Bio-Rad) packed with amylose resin (New England Biolab) equilibrated with buffer A and incubated overnight at 277 K. The fusion protein was eluted at 277 K using 20 mM TrisHCl pH 7.4, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM maltose and loaded onto a HiPrep 16/10 Q Sepharose FF column (Amersham) equilibrated with buffer B (20 mM TrisHCl pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA). Proteins were eluted using a linear NaCl concentration gradient in buffer C (20 mM TrisHCl pH 8.0, 1 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA). Fractions containing MBP-SARS-CoV Mpro were pooled, concentrated by ultrafiltration at 3000g (Centricon, Vivascience) and desalted in 20 mM TrisHCl pH 7.0, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2 using PD-10 columns (Amersham). One unit of factor Xa was added per 142 µg of fusion protein for 6 h at 297 K. After cleavage, factor Xa was removed using a resin (Qiagen). Cleaved products were loaded onto an XK 16/20 phenyl Sepharose resin column (Amersham) equilibrated in buffer D (12.5 mM TrisHCl pH 7.0, 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mM EDTA). The recombinant SARS-CoV Mpro was eluted using buffer E (12.5 mM TrisHCl pH 7.0, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mM EDTA). Fractions containing SARS-CoV Mpro were pooled and the buffer changed to 10 mM TrisHCl pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT for concentration to 5 mg ml−1 as determined using the Bradford method (Bio-Rad) with BSA as a standard and stored at 193 K.

Crystallization and data collection

Crystals of SARS-CoV Mpro were grown using the hanging-drop vapour-diffusion method. Equal volumes (1 µl) of protein and mother liquor were mixed over wells containing 0.1 M MES pH 6.5 and 0.6 M (NH4)2SO4 at 291 K. Macroseeding produced thin elongated plate-like crystals over a period of one week. For data collection, crystals were soaked in a cryoprotecting solution containing 30% glycerol, 0.1 M MES, 0.6 M (NH4)2SO4 pH 6.5, before being mounted and cooled to 100 K in a nitrogen-gas stream (Oxford Cryosystems). Diffraction intensities were recorded at beamline ID14-4 at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France on an ADSC CCD detector using an attenuated beam of 0.125 × 0.050 mm. Integration, scaling and merging of the intensities were carried out using programs from the CCP4 suite (Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4, 1994 ▶). Data-collection and refinement statistics are presented in Table 1 ▶.
Table 1

Data-collection and refinement statistics

Values in parentheses refer to the highest resolution shell.

Data-collection statistics 
 Space groupP21212
 Unit-cell parameters (Å)a = 107.7, b = 44.9, c = 54.2
 Resolution range (Å)28–1.90 (1.95–1.90)
 Unique reflections19895
 Redundancy8.0 (5.9)
 Completeness (%)97.9 (88.2)
I/σ(I)4.6 (2.2)
Rmerge (%)7.8 (31.4)
VM3 Da−1)1.95
Refinement statistics 
R (%)22.5 (27.5)
Rfree value (%)26.4 (31.2)
 No. of protein atoms2302 [301 residues]
 No. of solvent molecules211
 No. of reflections in working set19880
 No. of reflections in test set1077
 Mean temperature factor (Å2)35.21
 R.m.s.d. bond lengths (Å)0.006
 R.m.s.d. bond angles (°)1.31
 R.m.s.d. dihedral angles (°)24.7
 Ramachandran plot 
  Most favoured region (%)87.7
  Additionally allowed regions (%)11.1
  Generously allowed regions (%)0.8
  Disallowed regions (%)0.4

R merge = .

R = .

Structure determination and refinement

The structure of SARS-CoV Mpro was readily solved by molecular replacement using the program AMoRe from the CCP4 suite with the SARS-CoV Mpro structure deposited as PDB code 1uj1 as a search model. The program REFMAC5 was used for refinement cycles, which were alternated with rebuilding sessions using the program O (Jones et al., 1991 ▶). 5% of the reflections were set aside to monitor the progress of refinement using the R free factor. Water molecules, added automatically using ARP/wARP (Perrakis et al., 1999 ▶), were checked by visual inspection. The quality of the model was assessed using PROCHECK (Laskowski et al., 1993 ▶). Structure superposition was performed with LSQKAB (Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4, 1994 ▶).

Results and discussion

Overall structure of SARS-CoV Mpro

The model comprises one monomer per asymmetric unit (residues 1–301). Five residues from the C-terminus are not visible in the electron-density map and have been omitted. Residues 1–101 (domain I) and 102–184 (domain II) form the chymotrypsin-like double-β-barrel structure which is observed in several viral proteases including picornaviruses, togaviruses and flaviviruses (Babe & Craik, 1997 ▶). The C-terminal α-helical domain (residues 201–301) of SARS-CoV Mpro is required for activity, since a truncated fragment comprising only its catalytic domain displays a significant decrease in enzymatic activity (Bacha et al., 2004 ▶). Structural and functional studies of coronavirus Mpro have shown that dimerization is required for maximal protease activity. In this respect, a prominent role is played by the seven amino-terminal amino acids, which adopt an extended conformation making extensive contacts with domain II of the other monomer and ensuring the formation of a catalytically competent active site (Yang et al., 2003 ▶). In our crystal form, the active dimer is generated through the crystallographic twofold. No contact is established by Ser1, which is mobile as shown by a higher than average temperature factor. The path of the main chain, however, closely follows that observed in previously reported active monomers, with an r.m.s deviation of 0.80 Å for 300 equivalent main-chain atoms (PDB code 1uj1 chain A; Yang et al., 2003 ▶) (Fig. 1 ▶ a). This latter crystal form belongs to space group P21 and contains one dimer in the asymmetric unit with quasi-twofold symmetry. This indicates that the N-terminal residue is not absolutely required for the active site to adopt an active conformation.
Figure 1

(a) Overall superposition of the Cα traces from the SARS-CoV Mpro monomer present in our asymmetric unit (coloured red, PDB code 2c3s) with the active monomer A of Yang et al. (2003 ▶) (shown in blue, PDB code 1uj1, chain A). A residual rotation of 4.5° is needed to then bring the two equivalent monomers B into coincidence. The active-site residues of each monomer are represented as sticks. (b) Detailed view of the active site represented as green sticks (2c3s, this work) superimposed onto the active monomer A of SARS-CoV Mpro (1uj1, chain A). The putative hydrogen bonds (dashed lines) formed by the spatially conserved water molecule (red sphere) are shown.

A figure showing the distribution of the thermal factors of the SARS-CoV main proteinase is available as supplementary material.1

Structure of the active site

The substrate-binding site is located in a cleft between the two β-­barrels. The catalytic Cys145-His41 dyad (with the cysteine thiol acting as the nucleophile) is used instead of the classical Ser-His-Asp triad of serine proteases (Fig. 1 ▶ b). Although the crystals were obtained at pH 6.5, a value which is presumably near the pK a value of His residues in the substrate-binding site and where the enzyme shows a slightly reduced activity, the conformation of the active site indicates an active enzyme (Fig. 1 ▶ b). The immediate vicinity of the active site is involved in extensive intermolecular contacts with neighbouring molecules. Thus, this crystal form is likely to be more suitable for studies involving soaking or co-crystallization of small compounds rather than long peptides. Interestingly, during the course of preparation and submission of this manuscript, related crystal forms of SARS-CoV Mpro have been reported by Hsu et al. (2005 ▶) and by Tan et al. (2005 ▶). PDB reference: SARS coronavirus main proteinase, 2c3s, 2c3ssf Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1744309105033257/sw5004sup1.pdf
  15 in total

Review 1.  Virus-encoded proteinases and proteolytic processing in the Nidovirales.

Authors:  J Ziebuhr; E J Snijder; A E Gorbalenya
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.891

2.  Automated protein model building combined with iterative structure refinement.

Authors:  A Perrakis; R Morris; V S Lamzin
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1999-05

3.  Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models.

Authors:  T A Jones; J Y Zou; S W Cowan; M Kjeldgaard
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  1991-03-01       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Identification of novel inhibitors of the SARS coronavirus main protease 3CLpro.

Authors:  Usman Bacha; Jennifer Barrila; Adrian Velazquez-Campoy; Stephanie A Leavitt; Ernesto Freire
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Coronavirus main proteinase (3CLpro) structure: basis for design of anti-SARS drugs.

Authors:  Kanchan Anand; John Ziebuhr; Parvesh Wadhwani; Jeroen R Mesters; Rolf Hilgenfeld
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The crystal structures of severe acute respiratory syndrome virus main protease and its complex with an inhibitor.

Authors:  Haitao Yang; Maojun Yang; Yi Ding; Yiwei Liu; Zhiyong Lou; Zhe Zhou; Lei Sun; Lijuan Mo; Sheng Ye; Hai Pang; George F Gao; Kanchan Anand; Mark Bartlam; Rolf Hilgenfeld; Zihe Rao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Mechanism of the maturation process of SARS-CoV 3CL protease.

Authors:  Min-Feng Hsu; Chih-Jung Kuo; Kai-Ti Chang; Hui-Chuan Chang; Chia-Cheng Chou; Tzu-Ping Ko; Hui-Lin Shr; Gu-Gang Chang; Andrew H-J Wang; Po-Huang Liang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Unique and conserved features of genome and proteome of SARS-coronavirus, an early split-off from the coronavirus group 2 lineage.

Authors:  Eric J Snijder; Peter J Bredenbeek; Jessika C Dobbe; Volker Thiel; John Ziebuhr; Leo L M Poon; Yi Guan; Mikhail Rozanov; Willy J M Spaan; Alexander E Gorbalenya
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Comparative full-length genome sequence analysis of 14 SARS coronavirus isolates and common mutations associated with putative origins of infection.

Authors:  Yi Jun Ruan; Chia Lin Wei; Ai Ling Ee; Vinsensius B Vega; Herve Thoreau; Se Thoe Yun Su; Jer-Ming Chia; Patrick Ng; Kuo Ping Chiu; Landri Lim; Tao Zhang; Chan Kwai Peng; Ean Oon Lynette Lin; Ng Mah Lee; Sin Leo Yee; Lisa F P Ng; Ren Ee Chee; Lawrence W Stanton; Philip M Long; Edison T Liu
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-05-24       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Aetiology: Koch's postulates fulfilled for SARS virus.

Authors:  Ron A M Fouchier; Thijs Kuiken; Martin Schutten; Geert van Amerongen; Gerard J J van Doornum; Bernadette G van den Hoogen; Malik Peiris; Wilina Lim; Klaus Stöhr; Albert D M E Osterhaus
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  12 in total

1.  Inhibitors of SARS-3CLpro: virtual screening, biological evaluation, and molecular dynamics simulation studies.

Authors:  Prasenjit Mukherjee; Falgun Shah; Prashant Desai; Mitchell Avery
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Without its N-finger, the main protease of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus can form a novel dimer through its C-terminal domain.

Authors:  Nan Zhong; Shengnan Zhang; Peng Zou; Jiaxuan Chen; Xue Kang; Zhe Li; Chao Liang; Changwen Jin; Bin Xia
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 3.  Activation and maturation of SARS-CoV main protease.

Authors:  Bin Xia; Xue Kang
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 14.870

4.  Three-dimensional domain swapping as a mechanism to lock the active conformation in a super-active octamer of SARS-CoV main protease.

Authors:  Shengnan Zhang; Nan Zhong; Fei Xue; Xue Kang; Xiaobai Ren; Jiaxuan Chen; Changwen Jin; Zhiyong Lou; Bin Xia
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 14.870

5.  X-Ray Structure and Inhibition of 3C-like Protease from Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus.

Authors:  Sarah E St John; Brandon J Anson; Andrew D Mesecar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Crystal structures reveal an induced-fit binding of a substrate-like Aza-peptide epoxide to SARS coronavirus main peptidase.

Authors:  Ting-Wai Lee; Maia M Cherney; Jie Liu; Karen Ellis James; James C Powers; Lindsay D Eltis; Michael N G James
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-12-02       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 7.  Viral enzymes.

Authors:  Jeroen R Mesters; Jinzhi Tan; Rolf Hilgenfeld
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 6.809

8.  A structural view of the inactivation of the SARS coronavirus main proteinase by benzotriazole esters.

Authors:  Koen H G Verschueren; Ksenia Pumpor; Stefan Anemüller; Shuai Chen; Jeroen R Mesters; Rolf Hilgenfeld
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2008-06

9.  Structure-based virtual screening against SARS-3CL(pro) to identify novel non-peptidic hits.

Authors:  Prasenjit Mukherjee; Prashant Desai; Larry Ross; E Lucile White; Mitchell A Avery
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Crystal structure of the papain-like protease of MERS coronavirus reveals unusual, potentially druggable active-site features.

Authors:  Jian Lei; Jeroen R Mesters; Christian Drosten; Stefan Anemüller; Qingjun Ma; Rolf Hilgenfeld
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 5.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.