Literature DB >> 16510836

Orthopaedic in-training examination scores: a correlation with USMLE results.

Kevin P Black1, Joshua M Abzug, Vernon M Chinchilli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both the United States Medical Licensing Examination and the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination measure factual recall as well as interpretative and problem-solving skills. The former examination is used to a variable degree by postgraduate programs in resident selection. Orthopaedic In-Training Examination scores are one measure of the medical knowledge of residents and are used by all American orthopaedic residency programs on a yearly basis. This investigation was performed to retrospectively review Orthopaedic In-Training Examination scores of orthopaedic residents who took the examination in our program. In addition, we sought to determine whether a relationship existed between performance on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination and the United States Medical Licensing Examinations taken while in medical school.
METHODS: The records of each orthopaedic resident who took the examination from November 1993 through November 2000 were reviewed. Correlation coefficients and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to assess the relationship, if any, between the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination percentiles and the three-digit scores on the Step-1 and Step-2 United States Medical Licensing Examination. In addition, examination scores were evaluated longitudinally from year-in-training 1 through 4.
RESULTS: A significant moderate-sized correlation was found between United States Medical Licensing Examination Step-2 scores and Orthopaedic In-Training Examination score percentiles (p < 0.05); however, with the numbers available, no correlation was seen between United States Medical Licensing Examination Step-1 scores and Orthopaedic In-Training Examination scores. The mean Orthopaedic In-Training Examination scores were in the 66th percentile for year-in-training 1, the 53rd percentile for year 2, the 57th percentile for year 3, and the 50th percentile for year 4. Residents in the laboratory for one year scored in the 88th percentile while in the laboratory (year 0), in the 86th percentile in year 1, and in the 48th percentile in year 4.
CONCLUSION: Although Step-1 United States Medical Licensing Examination scores have been used by our department as a major factor in resident selection historically, our data failed to reveal a significant correlation with performance on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination. The decrease in Orthopaedic In-Training Examination scores over time for our residents who worked in the laboratory is most likely attributable to multiple factors, including clinical workload hours.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16510836     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.C.01184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  14 in total

1.  Predictive measures of a resident's performance on written Orthopaedic Board scores.

Authors:  Bradley W Dyrstad; David Pope; Joseph C Milbrandt; Ryan T Beck; Anita L Weinhoeft; Osaretin B Idusuyi
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2011

2.  Do scores of the USMLE Step 1 and OITE correlate with the ABOS Part I certifying examination?: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Paul J Dougherty; Norman Walter; Peter Schilling; Soheil Najibi; Harry Herkowitz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Associations between United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) and Internal Medicine In-Training Examination (IM-ITE) scores.

Authors:  Furman S McDonald; Scott L Zeger; Joseph C Kolars
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  A survey of collection development for United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) and National Board Dental Examination (NBDE) preparation material.

Authors:  Dean Hendrix; Linda Hasman
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2008-07

5.  Use of an integrated, anatomic-based, orthopaedic resident education curriculum: a 5-year retrospective review of its impact on orthopaedic in-training examination scores.

Authors:  Joel C Klena; Jove H Graham; Jeffrey S Lutton; Jessica L Temple; John David Beck
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2012-06

6.  Performance in the Duke-Elder ophthalmology undergraduate prize examination and future careers in ophthalmology.

Authors:  L Joshi; V A Shanmuganathan; R L Kneebone; W Amoaku
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Does Residency Selection Criteria Predict Performance in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency?

Authors:  Tina Raman; Rami George Alrabaa; Amit Sood; Paul Maloof; Joseph Benevenia; Wayne Berberian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Identifying Best Practices for and Utilities of the Pharmacy Curriculum Outcome Assessment Examination.

Authors:  Timothy Y Mok; Frank Romanelli
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-12-25       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  How should unmatched orthopaedic surgery applicants proceed?

Authors:  Nirav H Amin; Andre M Jakoi; Douglas L Cerynik; Neil S Kumar; Norman Johanson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Analysis of the Korean Orthopedic In-Training Examination: The Hip and Pelvis Section.

Authors:  Yohan Cho; Joon Yub Kim; Jai Hyung Park
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.