Literature DB >> 16510660

Assessment of pediatricians by a regulatory authority.

Claudio Violato1, Jocelyn M Lockyer, Herta Fidler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether it is possible to develop feasible, valid, and reliable multisource feedback data for pediatricians.
METHODS: Surveys with 40, 22, 38, and 37 items were developed for assessment of pediatricians by patients, co-workers, medical colleagues, and themselves, respectively, using 5-point scales with an "unable to assess" category. Items addressed key competencies related to communication skills, professionalism, collegiality, continuing professional development, and collaboration. Each pediatrician was assessed by 25 patients, 8 medical colleagues, and 8 co-workers. Feasibility was assessed with response rates for each instrument. Validity was assessed with rating profiles, the percentage of participants unable to assess the physician for each item, and exploratory factor analyses to determine which items grouped together into scales. Cronbach's alpha and generalizability coefficient analyses assessed reliability.
RESULTS: One hundred pediatricians participated. The mean number of respondents per physician was 23.4 (93.6%) for patients, 7.6 (94.8%) for co-workers, and 7.6 (95.5%) for medical colleagues. The mean ratings ranged from 4 to 5 for each item on each scale. Few items had high percentages of "unable to assess" responses. The factor analyses revealed a 4-factor solution for the patient survey, a 3-factor solution for the co-worker survey, and a 4-factor solution for the medical colleague survey, accounting for at least 64% of the variance. All instruments had high internal consistency. The generalizability coefficients were .85 for patients, .87 for co-workers, and .78 for medical colleagues.
CONCLUSION: Surveys can be developed to provide feedback data on key competencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16510660     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-1403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  6 in total

1.  Feasibility of an internet-based global ranking instrument.

Authors:  Seshadri C Mudumbai; David M Gaba; John Boulet; Steven K Howard; M Frances Davies
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-03

2.  Development of a multisource feedback instrument for clinical supervisors in postgraduate medical training.

Authors:  Mayen Egbe; Paul Baker
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.659

3.  Evaluation of physicians' professional performance: an iterative development and validation study of multisource feedback instruments.

Authors:  Karlijn Overeem; Hub C Wollersheim; Onyebuchi A Arah; Juliette K Cruijsberg; Richard P T M Grol; Kiki M J M H Lombarts
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 4.  The construct and criterion validity of the multi-source feedback process to assess physician performance: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ahmed Al Ansari; Tyrone Donnon; Khalid Al Khalifa; Abdulla Darwish; Claudio Violato
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2014-02-27

Review 5.  Multisource feedback to assess pediatric practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Samah Al Alawi; Ahmed Al Ansari; Ayman Raees; Salman Al Khalifa
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2013-03-31

6.  Cross-cultural challenges in assessing medical professionalism among emergency physicians in a Middle Eastern Country (Bahrain): feasibility and psychometric properties of multisource feedback.

Authors:  Ahmed Al Ansari; Ahmed Al Meer; Mooza Althawadi; Deyari Henari; Khalid Al Khalifa
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-02-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.