Literature DB >> 16509842

Breast-conserving therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: long-term results.

Sushil Beriwal1, Gordon F Schwartz, Lydia Komarnicky, Jorge A Garcia-Young.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine patterns of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and local-regional recurrence (LRR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast-conserving therapy (BCT). A total of 153 breast cancer patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conservative surgery and radiation therapy between 1980 and 2002. The clinical stage (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] 1997) at diagnosis was IIA in 22%, IIB in 28%, IIIA in 39%, and IIIB in 11%. The prechemotherapy T size distribution was less than 2 cm in 5 patients, 2.1-5 cm in 100 patients, and greater than 5.1 cm in 48 patients. Sixty-seven patients (44%) underwent cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF)-based chemotherapy and 86 (56%) underwent Adriamycin-based chemotherapy. Thirty-seven patients (24%) had a complete pathologic response in the breast. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon (G.F.S.). The surgery was local excision alone in 19 patients, local excision and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in 130 patients, and ALND alone in 4 patients. Eleven patients had positive surgical margins. Rates of LRR-, IBTR-, and distant metastasis (DM)-free survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Patient and pathologic variables were then analyzed in an attempt to identify predictors of clinical outcome. With a median follow-up period of 55 months (range 6-200 months), eight patients developed LRR, five of which were classified as IBTR. Five- and 10-year actuarial rates of LRR-free, IBTR-free, and DM-free survival were 93% and 88%, 96% and 91%, and 70% and 58%, respectively. Pretreatment and pathologic parameters that positively correlated with IBTR were advanced stage (p = 0.03) and margin positivity (p = 0.04). No other clinical factors were predictive of higher recurrence. BCT results in a low rate of IBTR and LRR in appropriately selected patients. Advanced stage at presentation is associated with increased risk of IBTR, although overall recurrence is low. In selected cases, BCT is safe and an effective alternative to mastectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16509842     DOI: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00225.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  17 in total

1.  Taxane-based chemotherapy enhances response to neoadjuvant treatment for stage II and III breast cancer.

Authors:  J M Andrade; H H A Carrara; F F Pimentel; H R C Marana; A H Macchetti; L R Mouro; F E Zola; D G Tiezzi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Breast-conserving therapy and modified radical mastectomy for primary breast carcinoma: a matched comparative study.

Authors:  Lize Wang; Tao Ouyang; Tianfeng Wang; Yuntao Xie; Zhaoqing Fan; Benyao Lin; Jinfeng Li
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.087

3.  Small breast epithelial mucin (SBEM) has the potential to be a marker for predicting hematogenous micrometastasis and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Zhao-Zhe Liu; Xiao-Dong Xie; Shu-Xian Qu; Zhen-Dong Zheng; Ya-Kun Wang
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 4.  Function-preserving surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  Hideo Inaji; Chiyomi Egawa; Yoshifumi Komoike; Kazuyoshi Motomura; Kinji Nishiyama; Tatsuki R Kataoka; Hiroki Koyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Local recurrence rates are low in high-risk neoadjuvant breast cancer in the I-SPY 1 Trial (CALGB 150007/150012; ACRIN 6657).

Authors:  Elizabeth L Cureton; Christina Yau; Michael D Alvarado; Helen Krontiras; David W Ollila; Cheryl A Ewing; Sindy Monnier; Laura J Esserman
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  ABCG2 is a potential marker of tumor-initiating cells in breast cancer.

Authors:  Renata Danielle Sicchieri; Willian Abraham da Silveira; Larissa Raquel Mouro Mandarano; Tatiane Mendes Gonçalves de Oliveira; Hélio Humberto Angotti Carrara; Valdair Francisco Muglia; Jurandyr Moreira de Andrade; Daniel Guimarães Tiezzi
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-06-20

7.  Feasibility study of safe breast conservation in large and locally advanced cancers with use of radiopaque markers to mark pre-neoadjuvant chemotherapy tumor margins.

Authors:  Vivek Aggarwal; Gaurav Agarwal; Punita Lal; Narendra Krishnani; Anjali Mishra; Ashok K Verma; Saroj K Mishra
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Impact of factors affecting the residual tumor size diagnosed by MRI following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in comparison to pathology.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Shadfar Bahri; Rita S Mehta; Philip M Carpenter; Christine E McLaren; Wen-Pin Chen; Peter T Fwu; David J B Hsiang; Karen T Lane; John A Butler; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Impact of MRI-evaluated neoadjuvant chemotherapy response on change of surgical recommendation in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Byron A Feig; David J-B Hsiang; John A Butler; Rita S Mehta; Shadfar Bahri; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Surgical Outcomes of Primary Versus Post-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Breast Conservation Surgery: A Comparative Study from a Developing Country.

Authors:  Gaurav Agarwal; Chaitra Sonthineni; Sabaretnam Mayilvaganan; Anjali Mishra; Punita Lal; Vinita Agrawal
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.