Literature DB >> 16509151

Intraoperative corticomuscular motor evoked potentials for evaluation of motor function: a comparison with corticospinal D and I waves.

Minoru Fujiki1, Yoshie Furukawa, Tohru Kamida, Mitsuhiro Anan, Ryo Inoue, Tatsuya Abe, Hidenori Kobayashi.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The goal of this study was to compare motor evoked potentials recorded from muscles (muscle MEPs or corticomuscular MEPs) with corticospinal MEPs recorded from the cervical epidural space (spinal MEPs or corticospinal MEPs) to assess their efficacy in the intraoperative monitoring of motor function.
METHODS: Muscle and spinal MEPs were simultaneously recorded during surgery in 80 patients harboring brain tumors. Each case was assigned to one of four groups according to final changes in the MEPs: (1) Group A, in which there was an increased amplitude in the muscle MEP with an increased 13 wave amplitude (12 cases); (2) Group B, in which there was no significant change in the MEP (43 cases); (3) Group C, in which there was a decreased muscle MEP amplitude (< 35% of the control) with a decreased I wave amplitude but an unchanged D wave (15 cases); or (4) Group D, in which there was an absent muscle MEP with a decreased D wave amplitude (10 cases). In patients in Group A, the increase in the amplitude of the muscle MEP (range of increase 128-280%, mean increase 188.75 +/- 48.79%) was well correlated with the increase in the 13 wave in corticospinal MEPs. Most of these patterns were observed in patients harboring meningiomas (10 [83.3%] of 12 cases). Patients in Group B displayed no changes in muscle and corticospinal MEPs and no signs of postoperative neurological deterioration. Patients in Group C showed a substantial decrease in the amplitude of the muscle MEP (range of decrease 5.3-34.8% based on the control waveform, mean change 21.81 +/- 10.93%) without deterioration in the corticospinal D wave, and exhibited severe immediate postoperative motor dysfunction. This indicates dysfunction of the cortical gray matter, including the motor cortices, which are supposed to generate I waves. Patients in Group D exhibited decreases in the corticospinal D wave (range of decrease 21.5-55%, mean decrease 39.75 +/- 11.45%) and an immediate cessation of the muscle MEP as well as severe permanent motor paresis.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that, during surgery, monitoring of corticomuscular MEPs (which are related to I waves) is a much more sensitive method for the detection of immediate motor cortical damage than monitoring of corticospinal MEPs (D wave).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16509151     DOI: 10.3171/jns.2006.104.1.85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  11 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: overview and update.

Authors:  David B Macdonald
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Intraoperative neurophysiology of the motor system in children: a tailored approach.

Authors:  Francesco Sala; Paolo Manganotti; Stefan Grossauer; Vincenzo Tramontanto; Carlo Mazza; Massimo Gerosa
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Usefulness of multi-channels in intraoperative spinal cord monitoring: multi-center study by the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.

Authors:  Zenya Ito; Yukihiro Matsuyama; Kenichi Shinomiya; Muneharu Ando; Shigenori Kawabata; Tsukasa Kanchiku; Takanori Saito; Masato Takahashi; Shinichiro Taniguchi; Naoya Yamamoto; Kei Yamada; Kazunobu Kida; Yasushi Fujiwara; Sho Kobayashi; Kazuhiko Satomi; Toshikazu Tani
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Implementation of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring during Endovascular Procedures in the Central Nervous System.

Authors:  Alicia Martinez Piñeiro; Carles Cubells; Pablo Garcia; Carlos Castaño; Antonio Dávalos; Jaume Coll-Canti
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2015-03

Review 5.  Assessing the Capabilities of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to Aid in the Removal of Brain Tumors Affecting the Motor Cortex: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lucas Jose Vaz Schiavao; Iuri Neville Ribeiro; Cintya Yukie Hayashi; Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo; Andre Russowsky Brunoni; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Gabriel Pokorny; Wellingson Silva Paiva
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 2.989

Review 6.  Functional Mapping for Glioma Surgery, Part 2: Intraoperative Mapping Tools.

Authors:  Ramin A Morshed; Jacob S Young; Anthony T Lee; Shawn L Hervey-Jumper
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.509

7.  Sensitivity and specificity in transcranial motor-evoked potential monitoring during neurosurgical operations.

Authors:  Satoshi Tanaka; Takashi Tashiro; Akira Gomi; Junko Takanashi; Hiroshi Ujiie
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2011-08-13

Review 8.  Intraoperative functional mapping and monitoring during glioma surgery.

Authors:  Taiichi Saito; Yoshihiro Muragaki; Takashi Maruyama; Manabu Tamura; Masayuki Nitta; Yoshikazu Okada
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  What Is the Best Multimodality Combination for Intraoperative Spinal Cord Monitoring of Motor Function? A Multicenter Study by the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.

Authors:  Zenya Ito; Yukihiro Matsuyama; Muneharu Ando; Shigenori Kawabata; Tsukasa Kanchiku; Kazunobu Kida; Yasushi Fujiwara; Kei Yamada; Naoya Yamamoto; Sho Kobayashi; Takanori Saito; Kanichiro Wada; Kazuhiko Satomi; Kenichi Shinomiya; Toshikazu Tani
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-07-31

10.  I-waves in motor cortex revisited.

Authors:  Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.