Literature DB >> 16508975

Correlated mutations: advances and limitations. A study on fusion proteins and on the Cohesin-Dockerin families.

Inbal Halperin1, Haim Wolfson, Ruth Nussinov.   

Abstract

Correlated mutations have been repeatedly exploited for intramolecular contact map prediction. Over the last decade these efforts yielded several methods for measuring correlated mutations. Nevertheless, the application of correlated mutations for the prediction of intermolecular interactions has not yet been explored. This gap is due to several obstacles, such as 3D complexes availability, paralog discrimination, and the availability of sequence pairs that are required for inter- but not intramolecular analyses. Here we selected for analysis fusion protein families that bypass some of these obstacles. We find that several correlated mutation measurements yield reasonable accuracy for intramolecular contact map prediction on the fusion dataset. However, the accuracy level drops sharply in intermolecular contacts prediction. This drop in accuracy does not occur always. In the Cohesin-Dockerin family, reasonable accuracy is achieved in the prediction of both intra- and intermolecular contacts. The Cohesin-Dockerin family is well suited for correlated mutation analysis. Because, however, this family constitutes a special case (it has radical mutations, has domain repeats, within each species each Dockerin domain interacts with each Cohesin domain, see below), the successful prediction in this family does not point to a general potential in using correlated mutations for predicting intermolecular contacts. Overall, the results of our study indicate that current methodologies of correlated mutations analysis are not suitable for large-scale intermolecular contact prediction, and thus cannot assist in docking. With current measurements, sequence availability, sequence annotations, and underdeveloped sequence pairing methods, correlated mutations can yield reasonable accuracy only for a handful of families. 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16508975     DOI: 10.1002/prot.20933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  50 in total

1.  Crucial roles of single residues in binding affinity, specificity, and promiscuity in the cellulosomal cohesin-dockerin interface.

Authors:  Michal Slutzki; Dan Reshef; Yoav Barak; Rachel Haimovitz; Shahar Rotem-Bamberger; Raphael Lamed; Edward A Bayer; Ora Schueler-Furman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  A comprehensive assessment of sequence-based and template-based methods for protein contact prediction.

Authors:  Sitao Wu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Using multi-data hidden Markov models trained on local neighborhoods of protein structure to predict residue-residue contacts.

Authors:  Patrik Björkholm; Pawel Daniluk; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Krzysztof Fidelis; Robin Andersson; Torgeir R Hvidsten
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Coevolution at protein complex interfaces can be detected by the complementarity trace with important impact for predictive docking.

Authors:  Hocine Madaoui; Raphaël Guerois
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  BCL::contact-low confidence fold recognition hits boost protein contact prediction and de novo structure determination.

Authors:  Mert Karakaş; Nils Woetzel; Jens Meiler
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.479

6.  A novel method for protein-protein interaction site prediction using phylogenetic substitution models.

Authors:  David La; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-10-12

7.  Evaluation of residue-residue contact predictions in CASP9.

Authors:  Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Krzysztof Fidelis; Anna Tramontano; Andriy Kryshtafovych
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-09-17

8.  NNcon: improved protein contact map prediction using 2D-recursive neural networks.

Authors:  Allison N Tegge; Zheng Wang; Jesse Eickholt; Jianlin Cheng
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Computational protein design: validation and possible relevance as a tool for homology searching and fold recognition.

Authors:  Marcel Schmidt Am Busch; Audrey Sedano; Thomas Simonson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Characterization of non-trivial neighborhood fold constraints from protein sequences using generalized topohydrophobicity.

Authors:  Guillaume Fourty; Isabelle Callebaut; Jean-Paul Mornon
Journal:  Bioinform Biol Insights       Date:  2008-01-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.