Literature DB >> 16508953

Myocardial tagging and strain analysis at 3 Tesla: comparison with 1.5 Tesla imaging.

V Uma Valeti1, Wookjin Chun, Donald D Potter, Philip A Araoz, Kiaran P McGee, James F Glockner, Timothy F Christian.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether imaging at 3 T could improve and prolong the tag contrast compared to images acquired at 1.5 T in normal volunteers, and whether such improvement would translate into the ability to perform strain measurements in diastole.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Normal volunteers (N = 13) were scanned at 1.5 T (GE Signa CV/i) and 3.0 T (GE VH/i). An ECG-triggered, segmented k-space, spoiled-gradient-echo grid-tagged sequence was used during cine acquisition. Tag contrast was determined by the difference of the mean signal intensity (SI) of the tagline to the mean SI of the myocardium divided by the standard deviation (SD) of the noise (CNR(tag)). Matched short-axis (SA) slices were analyzed. Strain measurements were performed on images using a 2D strain analysis software program (harmonic phase (HARP)).
RESULTS: The average CNR(tag) over the cardiac cycle was superior at 3 T compared to 1.5 T for all slices (3 T: 23.4 +/- 12.1, 1.5 T: 9.8 +/- 8.4; P < 0.0001). This difference remained significant at cycle initiation, end-systole, and the end R-R interval (at cycle termination: 3 T = 14.0 +/- 11.0 vs. 1.5 T = 4.4 +/- 3.5; P < 0.01). Strain measures were obtainable only in early systole for 1.5 T images, but were robust throughout the entire R-R interval for 3 T images.
CONCLUSION: Imaging at 3 T had a significant benefit for myocardial tag persistence through the cardiac cycle. The improvement allowed strain analysis to be performed into diastole. 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16508953     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  15 in total

Review 1.  Myocardial tagging by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: evolution of techniques--pulse sequences, analysis algorithms, and applications.

Authors:  El-Sayed H Ibrahim
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 2.  Evaluation of left ventricular function using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Suchi Grover; Darryl P Leong; Joseph B Selvanayagam
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Quantification of regional myocardial wall motion by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Kai Jiang; Xin Yu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-10

4.  Patterns of left ventricular remodeling in patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: a cardiac MRI study of ventricular geometry, global function, and strain.

Authors:  Wojciech Mazur; Kan N Hor; Joshua T Germann; Robert J Fleck; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Janaka P Wansapura; Eugene S Chung; Michael D Taylor; John L Jefferies; D Woodrow Benson; William M Gottliebson
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Liver stiffness assessment by tagged MRI of cardiac-induced liver motion.

Authors:  Sohae Chung; Elodie Breton; Lorenzo Mannelli; Leon Axel
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Clinical applications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 3 tesla.

Authors:  Allison G Hays; Michael Schär; Sebastian Kelle
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2009-08

7.  Regional circumferential strain is a biomarker for disease severity in duchenne muscular dystrophy heart disease: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Kan N Hor; Narayan Kissoon; Wojciech Mazur; Resmi Gupta; Richard F Ittenbach; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Linda H Cripe; Subha V Raman; Michael D Puchalski; William M Gottliebson; D Woodrow Benson
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Circumferential strain analysis identifies strata of cardiomyopathy in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a cardiac magnetic resonance tagging study.

Authors:  Kan N Hor; Janaka Wansapura; Larry W Markham; Wojciech Mazur; Linda H Cripe; Robert Fleck; D Woodrow Benson; William M Gottliebson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Peri-infarct dysfunction in post-myocardial infarction: assessment of 3-T tagged and late enhancement MRI.

Authors:  Yuma Inoue; Xiaomei Yang; Michinobu Nagao; Hiroshi Higashino; Kohei Hosokawa; Teruhito Kido; Akira Kurata; Hideki Okayama; Jitsuo Higaki; Teruhito Mochizuki; Kenya Murase
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Combined myocardial stress perfusion imaging and myocardial stress tagging for detection of coronary artery disease at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Daniel Thomas; Katharina Strach; Carsten Meyer; Claas P Naehle; Sebastian Schaare; Sven Wasmann; Hans H Schild; Torsten Sommer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.