Literature DB >> 16507926

Membrane sweeping at initiation of formal labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.

Peng Chiong Tan1, Reena Jacob, Siti Zawiah Omar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the benefit of membrane sweeping at initiation of labor induction in conjunction with formal methods of labor induction.
METHODS: Two hundred seventy-four women at term with a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation and intact membranes were randomly assigned to receive membrane sweeping or no membrane sweeping at initiation of formal labor induction with either dinoprostone pessary or amniotomy. Outcome measures included mode of delivery, induction-to-delivery interval, dinosprostone dose, any oxytocin use and duration of oxytocin use in labor, visual analog score for pain associated with sweeping, and visual analog score for satisfaction with the birth process.
RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-four women (136 sweep and 128 no sweep) had their data analyzed. Ten women (4 sweep and 6 no sweep) were excluded because of exclusion criteria infringements. Swept women had higher spontaneous vaginal delivery rate (69% compared with 56%, P = .041), shorter induction to delivery interval (mean 14 compared with 19 hours, P = .003), fewer that required oxytocin use (46% compared with 59%, P = .037), shorter duration of oxytocin infusion (mean 2.6 compared with 4.3 hours, P = .001) and improved visual analog score for birth process satisfaction (mean 4.0 compared with 4.7, P = .015). The reduction in dinoprostone dose used (mean 1.2 compared with 1.3, P = .082) was not significant. Postsweeping visual analog score for pain (mean 4.7 compared with 3.5, P < .001) was significantly increased.
CONCLUSION: Membrane sweeping at initiation of labor induction increased the spontaneous vaginal delivery rate, reduced oxytocic drug use, shortened induction to delivery interval, and improved patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16507926     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000200094.89388.70

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

1.  Effect of hyoscine butylbromide first stage of labour in multiparus women.

Authors:  L Sekhavat; S A Karbasi; R Fallah; M Mirowliai
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.927

2.  Membrane Sweeping for Vaginal Birth after Caesarean Section and its Outcome -A Comparative Study.

Authors:  V Ramya; Seetesh Ghose; P Pallavee
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-08-01

Review 3.  Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.

Authors:  M Boulvain; C Stan; O Irion
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-01-25

4.  Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.

Authors:  Elaine M Finucane; Deirdre J Murphy; Linda M Biesty; Gillian Ml Gyte; Amanda M Cotter; Ethel M Ryan; Michel Boulvain; Declan Devane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-02-27

5.  Antepartum Membrane Stripping in GBS Carriers, Is It Safe? (The STRIP-G Study).

Authors:  Doron Kabiri; Yael Hants; Tom Raz Yarkoni; Esther Shaulof; Smadar Eventov Friedman; Ora Paltiel; Ran Nir-Paz; Wesam E Aljamal; Yossef Ezra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Impact of Self-Reported Sleep on Caesarean Delivery in Women Undergoing Induction of Labour: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Aimee Chuin Ai Teong; Annabella Xinhui Diong; Siti Zawiah Omar; Peng Chiong Tan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.