Literature DB >> 16507791

Use of emboli-blocking filters increases, but rigorous data are lacking.

Erin Brender.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16507791     DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.9.989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Venous thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  Michael B Streiff; Paula L Bockenstedt; Spero R Cataland; Carolyn Chesney; Charles Eby; John Fanikos; Patrick F Fogarty; Shuwei Gao; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Hani Hassoun; Paul Hendrie; Bjorn Holmstrom; Kimberly A Jones; Nicole Kuderer; Jason T Lee; Michael M Millenson; Anne T Neff; Thomas L Ortel; Judy L Smith; Gary C Yee; Anaadriana Zakarija
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 2.  Thromboembolic disease in cancer patients.

Authors:  Nadia Hindi; Nazaret Cordero; Enrique Espinosa
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Improving the tracking and removal of retrievable inferior vena cava filters.

Authors:  Anthony D Goei; Shellie C Josephs; Thomas B Kinney; Charles E Ray; David Sacks
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 4.  Retrievable vena cava filters: a clinical review.

Authors:  Davide Imberti; Walter Ageno; Francesco Dentali; Marco Donadini; Roberto Manfredini; Massimo Gallerani
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Inferior vena cava filters.

Authors:  Thomas B Kinney
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.513

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.