Literature DB >> 16507506

Quality of life and maintenance of improvements after early multimodal rehabilitation: a 5-year follow-up.

A Westman1, S J Linton, T Theorell, J Ohrvik, P Wahlén, J Leppert.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is a paucity of long-term evaluations on rehabilitation of musculoskeletal disorders, e.g., neck, shoulder or back pain. The aim of this study was to assess quality of life and the effect of early multimodal rehabilitation on 91 patients with musculoskeletal pain and disability at a 5-year follow-up.
METHOD: The follow-up assessment, which included questions on pain, function, quality of life, perceived health, sick leave and psychosomatic symptoms, was performed 5 years after the assessment of baseline status.
RESULTS: Improvements in pain, perceived health and psychosomatic symptoms were maintained at the 5-year follow-up. In addition, improvements in function, quality of life, and level of acceptable pain were significant in comparison to baseline. At the time of the baseline assessment all patients were on sick leave (13% were on partial sick leave). At the 5-year follow-up, 58% of the patients were at work part or full time. The results show that those working differed significantly from those not working at the 5-year follow-up on almost all variables, indicating that those working enjoy better health. The most salient prognostic factors for return to work were perceived health and educational level at the time of the baseline evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS: These results show that treatment improved quality of life and the effects were basically maintained at 5 years. Work capacity as reflected in return to work increased greatly (81%) at a 1-year follow-up and was substantial (58%) at the 5-year follow-up. Moreover, perceived health and educational levels were important prognostic factors. Finally, the fact that patients working reported better health underscores the probable importance of return to work. Our results imply that it may be feasible to obtain long-term benefits from such a primary care-based intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16507506     DOI: 10.1080/09638280500192694

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  7 in total

Review 1.  Health economics of interdisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic pain: does it support or invalidate the outcomes research of these programs?

Authors:  Annette Becker
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-04

2.  Costs of shoulder pain and resource use in primary health care: a cost-of-illness study in Sweden.

Authors:  Lena Virta; Pål Joranger; Jens Ivar Brox; Rikard Eriksson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Back to work: evaluation of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program with emphasis on mental symptoms; A two-year follow up.

Authors:  Rita Sjöström; Ragnar Asplund; Marie Alricsson
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2012-06-25

Review 4.  Longitudinal outcome evaluations of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Treatment programmes for patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefan Elbers; Harriët Wittink; Sophie Konings; Ulrike Kaiser; Jos Kleijnen; Jan Pool; Albère Köke; Rob Smeets
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 3.651

5.  A 9-year follow-up of a self-management group intervention for persistent neck pain in primary health care: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Catharina Gustavsson; Lena von Koch
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 3.133

6.  "Sense of Control": Patients' Experiences of Multimodal Pain Rehabilitation and its Impact in their Everyday Lives.

Authors:  Anke Samulowitz; Pia Nordstrom; Malin Wiklund; Nenad Stankovic; Gunnel Hensing
Journal:  J Rehabil Med Clin Commun       Date:  2019-04-24

Review 7.  Interdisciplinary Care Networks in Rehabilitation Care for Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cynthia Lamper; Laura Beckers; Mariëlle Kroese; Jeanine Verbunt; Ivan Huijnen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.