Literature DB >> 16506976

Dangerous news: media decision making about climate change risk.

Joe Smith1.   

Abstract

This article explores the role of broadcast news media decision makers in shaping public understanding and debate of climate change risks. It locates the media within a "tangled web" of communication and debate between sources, media, and publics. The article draws on new qualitative research in the British context. The main body of it focuses on media source strategies, on climate change storytelling in news, and the "myth of detachment" sustained by many news decision makers. The empirical evidence, gathered between 1997 and 2004, is derived primarily from recordings and notes drawn from a series of seminars that has brought together equal numbers of BBC news and television decision makers and environment/development specialists. The seminars have created a rare space for extended dialogue between media and specialist perspectives on the communication of complex climate change science and policy. While the article acknowledges the distinctive nature of the BBC as a public sector broadcaster, the evidence confirms and extends current understanding of the career of climate change within the media more broadly. The working group discussions have explored issues arising out of how stories are sourced and, in the context of competitive and time-pressured newsrooms, shaped and presented in short news pieces. Particularly significant is the disjuncture between ways of talking about uncertainty within science and policy discourse and media constructions of objectivity, truth, and balance. The article concludes with a summary of developments in media culture, technology, and practice that are creating opportunities for enhanced public understanding and debate of climate change risks. It also indicates the need for science and policy communities to be more active critics and sources of news.

Year:  2005        PMID: 16506976     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00693.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  3 in total

1.  Now what do people know about global climate change? Survey studies of educated laypeople.

Authors:  Travis William Reynolds; Ann Bostrom; Daniel Read; M Granger Morgan
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Balancing obligations: should written information about life-sustaining treatment be neutral?

Authors:  Vicki Xafis; Dominic Wilkinson; Lynn Gillam; Jane Sullivan
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Perception of Climate Change in Shrimp-Farming Communities in Bangladesh: A Critical Assessment.

Authors:  Shaikh Mohammad Kais; Md Saidul Islam
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.