Literature DB >> 16506010

A TMS study on non-consciously triggered response tendencies in the motor cortex.

Rolf Verleger1, Thomas Kötter, Piotr Jaśkowski, Andreas Sprenger, Hartwig Siebner.   

Abstract

Non-consciously perceived arrow stimuli can speed up responses to similar stimuli that are shortly presented after a masked prime. Yet response facilitation may turn into a delay at particular intervals between masked primes and targets. In this case, the lateralized readiness potential, as a measure of the time course of differential activation between the primed and the unprimed motor cortices, consistently yielded two consecutive maxima of opposite polarity, at 250 and at 350 ms after prime onset. To further explore the mechanisms underlying inverse priming, we used single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the left or right primary motor hand area (M1). Lateralized changes in corticomotor excitability induced by the masked prime were probed by assessing the effect of priming on the amplitude of the TMS-induced motor-evoked potentials (MEPs). In two experiments, MEPs increased and decreased, respectively, in the hand primed by the masked arrows when TMS was given at 250 and at 350 ms after prime onset, confirming the expectation that MEP changes may indicate the response tendencies induced by the masked primes. Both effects were more distinct with TMS of the left M1. However, there were also some differences between the patterns of results in the two experiments. We propose that the left M1 is activated for preparation of both right- and left-hand movements, and we relate the present results to current hypotheses about the nature of inverse priming.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16506010     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0371-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  42 in total

1.  Specific and non-specific effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on simple and go/no-go reaction time.

Authors:  L Sawaki; T Okita; M Fujiwara; K Mizuno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Human corticospinal excitability evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation during different reaction time paradigms.

Authors:  L Leocani; L G Cohen; E M Wassermann; K Ikoma; M Hallett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Motor activation with and without inhibition: evidence for a threshold mechanism in motor control.

Authors:  Friederike Schlaghecken; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-01

Review 4.  Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; Friederike Schlaghecken
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Unconscious modulation of motor cortex excitability revealed with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Hugo Théoret; Erin Halligan; Masahito Kobayashi; Lotfi Merabet; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Birgit Stürmer; Hartmut Leuthold; Eric Soetens; Hannes Schröter; Werner Sommer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Focal transcranial magnetic stimulation and response bias in a forced-choice task.

Authors:  J P Brasil-Neto; A Pascual-Leone; J Valls-Solé; L G Cohen; M Hallett
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Exploring the contributions of premotor and parietal cortex to spatial compatibility using image-guided TMS.

Authors:  Lisa Koski; Istvan Molnar-Szakacs; Marco Iacoboni
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Changes in the response to magnetic and electrical stimulation of the motor cortex following muscle stretch in man.

Authors:  B L Day; H Riescher; A Struppler; J C Rothwell; C D Marsden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  M Eimer; F Schlaghecken
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  5 in total

1.  Sequential modulation of (bottom-up) response activation and inhibition in a response conflict task: a single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Barbara Treccani; Giorgia Cona; Nadia Milanese; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-04-09

2.  The negative compatibility effect: A case for self-inhibition.

Authors:  Friederike Schlaghecken; Laura Rowley; Sukhdev Sembi; Rachel Simmons; Daniel Whitcomb
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

3.  Parallel processing streams for motor output and sensory prediction during action preparation.

Authors:  Max-Philipp Stenner; Markus Bauer; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Patrick Haggard; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Working memory load reduces corticospinal suppression to former go and trained no-go cues.

Authors:  Dominic M D Tran; William G Nicholson; Justin A Harris; Irina M Harris; Evan J Livesey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The negative compatibility effect with relevant masks: a case for automatic motor inhibition.

Authors:  Brenda Ocampo; Matthew Finkbeiner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.