Literature DB >> 16505655

Minimizing errors of omission: behavioural reenforcement of heparin to avert venous emboli: the BEHAVE study.

J McMullin1, D Cook, L Griffith, E McDonald, F Clarke, G Guyatt, J Gibson, M Crowther.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To improve patient safety by increasing heparin thromboprophylaxis for medical-surgical intensive care unit patients using a multiple-method approach to evidence-based guideline development and implementation.
DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal observational study.
SETTING: Medical-surgical intensive care unit. PARTICIPANTS: Multidisciplinary clinicians caring for critically ill patients in a 15-bed medical-surgical closed intensive care unit.
INTERVENTIONS: Phase 1 was a 3-month baseline period during which we documented anticoagulation and mechanical thromboprophylaxis. Phase 2 was a 1-yr period in which we implemented a thromboprophylaxis guideline using a) interactive multidisciplinary educational in-services; b) verbal reminders to the intensive care unit team; c) computerized daily nurse recording of thromboprophylaxis; d) weekly graphic feedback to individual intensivists on guideline adherence; and e) publicly displayed graphic feedback on group performance. Phase 3 was a 3-month follow-up period 10 months later, during which we documented thromboprophylaxis. Computerized daily nurse recording of thromboprophylaxis continued in this period.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intensive care unit and hospital mortality rates were similar across phases, although patients in phase 2 had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores than patients in phases 1 and 3. The proportion (median % [interquartile range]) of intensive care unit patient-days of heparin thromboprophylaxis in phases 1, 2, and 3 was 60.0 (0, 100), 90.9 (50, 100), and 100.0 (60, 100), respectively (p=.01). The proportion (median % [interquartile range]) of days during which heparin thromboprophylaxis was omitted in error in phases 1, 2, and 3 was 20 (0, 53.8), 0 (0, 6.3), and 0 (0, 0), respectively (p<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: After development and implementation of an evidence-based thromboprophylaxis guideline, we found significantly more patients receiving heparin thromboprophylaxis. Guideline adherence was maintained 1 yr later. Further research is needed on which are the most effective strategies to implement patient safety initiatives in the intensive care unit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16505655     DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000201886.84135.CB

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  7 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to reduce medication errors in adult intensive care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Manias; Allison Williams; Danny Liew
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Medication errors in critical care: risk factors, prevention and disclosure.

Authors:  Eric Camiré; Eric Moyen; Henry Thomas Stelfox
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Feasibility and utility of the use of real time random safety audits in adult ICU patients: a multicentre study.

Authors:  M Bodí; M Olona; M C Martín; R Alceaga; J C Rodríguez; E Corral; J M Pérez Villares; G Sirgo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism in medical patients and outpatients.

Authors:  Gregg J Stashenko; Victor F Tapson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  Strategies to enhance venous thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients (SENTRY): a pilot cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Menaka Pai; Nancy S Lloyd; Ji Cheng; Lehana Thabane; Frederick A Spencer; Deborah J Cook; R Brian Haynes; Holger J Schünemann; James D Douketis
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Overview of medical errors and adverse events.

Authors:  Maité Garrouste-Orgeas; François Philippart; Cédric Bruel; Adeline Max; Nicolas Lau; B Misset
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 6.925

7.  Thromboprophylaxis patterns and determinants in critically ill patients: a multicenter audit.

Authors:  François Lauzier; John Muscedere; Eric Deland; Demetrios Jim Kutsogiannis; Michael Jacka; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Mark Crowther; Rodrigo Cartin-Ceba; Michael J Cox; Nicole Zytaruk; Denise Foster; Tasnim Sinuff; France Clarke; Patrica Thompson; Steven Hanna; Deborah Cook
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 9.097

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.