OBJECTIVE:Glutamine (Gln)-supplemented total parenteral nutrition (TPN) improves clinical outcome after planned surgery, but the benefits of Gln-TPN for critically ill (intensive care unit; ICU) patients are still debated. DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, controlled, randomized trial. SETTING: ICUs in 16 hospitals in France. PATIENTS: One-hundred fourteen ICU patients admitted for multiple trauma (38), complicated surgery (65), or pancreatitis (11). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive isocaloric isonitrogenous TPN via a central venous catheter providing 37.5 kcal and 1.5 g amino acids.kg-1.day-1 supplemented with either L-alanyl-L-glutamine dipeptide (0.5 g.kg-1.day-1; Ala-Gln group, n=58) or L-alanine+L-proline (control group, n=56) over at least 5 days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Complicated clinical outcome was defined a priori by the occurrence of infectious complications (according to the criteria of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), wound complication, or death. The two groups were compared by chi-square test on an intention-to-treat basis. The two groups did not differ at inclusion for type and severity of injury (mean simplified acute physiology score II, 30 vs. 30.5; mean injury severity score, 44.9 vs. 42.3). Similar volumes of TPN were administered in both groups. Ala-Gln-supplemented TPN was associated with a lower incidence of complicated outcome (41% vs. 61%; p<.05), which was mainly due to a reduced infection rate per patient (mean, 0.45 vs. 0.71; p<.05) and incidence of pneumonia (10 vs. 19; p<.05). Early death rate during treatment and 6-month survival were not different. Hyperglycemia was less frequent (20 vs. 30 patients; p<.05) and there were fewer insulin-requiring patients (14 vs. 22; p<.05) in the Ala-Gln group. CONCLUSIONS:TPN supplemented with Ala-Gln dipeptide in ICU patients is associated with a reduced rate of infectious complications and better metabolic tolerance.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE:Glutamine (Gln)-supplemented total parenteral nutrition (TPN) improves clinical outcome after planned surgery, but the benefits of Gln-TPN for critically ill (intensive care unit; ICU) patients are still debated. DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, controlled, randomized trial. SETTING: ICUs in 16 hospitals in France. PATIENTS: One-hundred fourteen ICU patients admitted for multiple trauma (38), complicated surgery (65), or pancreatitis (11). INTERVENTIONS:Patients were randomized to receive isocaloric isonitrogenous TPN via a central venous catheter providing 37.5 kcal and 1.5 g amino acids.kg-1.day-1 supplemented with either L-alanyl-L-glutamine dipeptide (0.5 g.kg-1.day-1; Ala-Gln group, n=58) or L-alanine+L-proline (control group, n=56) over at least 5 days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Complicated clinical outcome was defined a priori by the occurrence of infectious complications (according to the criteria of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), wound complication, or death. The two groups were compared by chi-square test on an intention-to-treat basis. The two groups did not differ at inclusion for type and severity of injury (mean simplified acute physiology score II, 30 vs. 30.5; mean injury severity score, 44.9 vs. 42.3). Similar volumes of TPN were administered in both groups. Ala-Gln-supplemented TPN was associated with a lower incidence of complicated outcome (41% vs. 61%; p<.05), which was mainly due to a reduced infection rate per patient (mean, 0.45 vs. 0.71; p<.05) and incidence of pneumonia (10 vs. 19; p<.05). Early death rate during treatment and 6-month survival were not different. Hyperglycemia was less frequent (20 vs. 30 patients; p<.05) and there were fewer insulin-requiring patients (14 vs. 22; p<.05) in the Ala-Gln group. CONCLUSIONS: TPN supplemented with Ala-Gln dipeptide in ICU patients is associated with a reduced rate of infectious complications and better metabolic tolerance.
Authors: Prakasha Kempaiah; Karol Dokladny; Zachary Karim; Evans Raballah; John M Ong'echa; Pope L Moseley; Douglas J Perkins Journal: Mol Med Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 6.354
Authors: Jon Pérez-Bárcena; Pedro Marsé; Arturo Zabalegui-Pérez; Esther Corral; Rubén Herrán-Monge; María Gero-Escapa; Mercedes Cervera; Juan Antonio Llompart-Pou; Ignacio Ayestarán; Joan Maria Raurich; Antonio Oliver; Antonio Buño; Abelardo García de Lorenzo; Guiem Frontera Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2014-02-21 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Jay R Hoffman; Nicholas A Ratamess; Jie Kang; Stephanie L Rashti; Neil Kelly; Adam M Gonzalez; Michael Stec; Steven Anderson; Brooke L Bailey; Linda M Yamamoto; Lindsay L Hom; Brian R Kupchak; Avery D Faigenbaum; Carl M Maresh Journal: J Int Soc Sports Nutr Date: 2010-02-03 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: K Reinhart; F M Brunkhorst; H-G Bone; J Bardutzky; C-E Dempfle; H Forst; P Gastmeier; H Gerlach; M Gründling; S John; W Kern; G Kreymann; W Krüger; P Kujath; G Marggraf; J Martin; K Mayer; A Meier-Hellmann; M Oppert; C Putensen; M Quintel; M Ragaller; R Rossaint; H Seifert; C Spies; F Stüber; N Weiler; A Weimann; K Werdan; T Welte Journal: Ger Med Sci Date: 2010-06-28
Authors: Gisele P Oliveira; Mariana B G Oliveira; Raquel S Santos; Letícia D Lima; Cristina M Dias; Alexandre M Ab' Saber; Walcy R Teodoro; Vera L Capelozzi; Rachel N Gomes; Patricia T Bozza; Paolo Pelosi; Patricia R M Rocco Journal: Crit Care Date: 2009-05-19 Impact factor: 9.097