Literature DB >> 16505431

Venous thromboembolism in patients with colorectal cancer: incidence and effect on survival.

Allison Alcalay1, Ted Wun, Vijay Khatri, Helen K Chew, Danielle Harvey, Hong Zhou, Richard H White.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the incidence and outcomes associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE) among patients with colorectal cancer.
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of all colorectal cancer patients diagnosed in California between 1993 and 1995 and 1997 to 1999. Principal outcomes were incident symptomatic VTE events and death. Associations between specific risk factors and principal outcomes were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models.
RESULTS: Among 68,142 colorectal cancer patients, 50% were women, mean age was 70 +/- 15 years, and approximately 70% underwent a major operation. The 2-year cumulative incidence of VTE was 2,100 patients (3.1%), with an incidence rate that decreased significantly over time from 5.0% (events/100 patient-years) in months 0 to 6 to 1.4% during months 7 to 12 to 0.6% during the second year. Significant predictors of VTE included metastatic stage (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.2; 95% CI, 2.8 to 3.8) and three or more comorbid conditions (HR = 2.0; 95% CI, 1.7 to 2.3). The risk of VTE was significantly reduced among Asians/Pacific Islanders (HR = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.5.) and patients who underwent an abdominal operation (HR = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.4). In risk-adjusted models, VTE was a significant predictor of death within 1 year of cancer diagnosis among patients with local- (HR = 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.3) or regional-stage disease (HR = 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3 to 1.8) but not among patients with metastatic disease (HR = 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.2).
CONCLUSION: The incidence of VTE among colorectal cancer patients was highest in the first 6 months after diagnosis and decreased rapidly thereafter. Metastatic disease and the number of medical comorbidities were the strongest predictors of VTE. Incident VTE reduced survival among patients with local or regional disease, suggesting that, in these patients, VTE may reflect the presence of a biologically more aggressive cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16505431     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.2150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  98 in total

1.  Concomitant and antecedent deep venous thrombosis and cancer survival in male US veterans.

Authors:  Lesley A Anderson; Steven C Moore; Gloria Gridley; B J Stone; Ola Landgren
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2011-01-27

Review 2.  Thrombosis and cancer.

Authors:  Annie Young; Oliver Chapman; Carole Connor; Christopher Poole; Peter Rose; Ajay K Kakkar
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Reporting Bias Leading to Discordant Venous Thromboembolism Rates in the United States Versus Non-US Countries Following Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joseph J Fantony; Ajay Gopalakrishna; Megan Van Noord; Brant A Inman
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2015-09-26

4.  Venous Thromboembolism Is an Independent Predictor of Mortality Among Patients with Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Harry E Fuentes; D M Oramas; L H Paz; Y Wang; X A Andrade; A J Tafur
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2018-12

5.  Prevention of VTE in nonsurgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Susan R Kahn; Wendy Lim; Andrew S Dunn; Mary Cushman; Francesco Dentali; Elie A Akl; Deborah J Cook; Alex A Balekian; Russell C Klein; Hoang Le; Sam Schulman; M Hassan Murad
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Prevention of VTE in nonorthopedic surgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Michael K Gould; David A Garcia; Sherry M Wren; Paul J Karanicolas; Juan I Arcelus; John A Heit; Charles M Samama
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  A prospective evaluation of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kathryn Lanuke; Lloyd A Mack; Walley J Temple
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 8.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.

Authors:  Jonathan Laryea; Bradley Champagne
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-09

9.  Regional lymph node metastases are a strong risk factor for venous thromboembolism: results from the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study.

Authors:  Boris Dickmann; Jonas Ahlbrecht; Cihan Ay; Daniela Dunkler; Johannes Thaler; Werner Scheithauer; Peter Quehenberger; Christoph Zielinski; Ingrid Pabinger
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 9.941

10.  Postoperative venous thromboembolism rates vary significantly after different types of major abdominal operations.

Authors:  Debraj Mukherjee; Anne O Lidor; Kathryn M Chu; Susan L Gearhart; Elliott R Haut; David C Chang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.