| Literature DB >> 16504132 |
Lee H Lee1, Doris Lui, Patricia J Platner, Shi-Fang Hsu, Tin-Chun Chu, John J Gaynor, Quinn C Vega, Bonnie K Lustigman.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It has been reported that some marine cyanophage are temperate and can be induced from a lysogenic phase to a lytic phase by different agents such as heavy metals. However, to date no significant reports have focused on the temperate nature of freshwater cyanophage/cyanobacteria. Previous experiments with cyanophage AS-1 and cyanobacteria Anacystis nidulans have provided some evidence that AS-1 may have a lysogenic life cycle in addition to the characterized lytic cycle.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16504132 PMCID: PMC1397841 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-6-17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Figure 1The growth curve of AN-T and CuSOThe AN-T growth curves with addition of different concentrations of CuSO4 at day 4, and no CuSO4 added as the control. A. Control and CuSO4 3.1 × 10-3 M; B. Control and 3.1 × 10-4 M; C. Control and 3.1 × 10-5 M; D. Control and 3.1 × 10-6 M. □ O.D. (Control); ■ Cell no./ml × 107 (Control); ○ O.D. (Treated); ● Cell no./ml × 107 (Treated).
Figure 2PFU from CuSOPlaque Forming Unit (PFU) from AN-T after the CuSO4 induction; a) no plaques, b) proper numbers of PFUs for counting.
Summary of heavy metal CuSO4 induction. Heavy metal CuSO4 induction: Summary of the growth of AN-T; PFU; PFU per 106 A. nidulans; PFUs change rate for treated/control; PFU per 106 A. nidulans treated/control and PIR with different concentrations of CuSO4 at 6 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours after addition of different concentrations of CuSO4 at day 4 and non-CuSO4 added as a control.
| CuSO4 | Control (No CuSO4 added) | |||
| Time after induction (hrs) | 0 | 6 | 24 | 48 |
| OD 750 nm | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.39 ± 0.06 | 0.45 ± 0.03 | 0.56 ± 0.08 |
| Cell numbers (107) | 3.60 ± 0.28 | 2.60 ± 0.27 | 2.06 ± 0.36 | 3.57 ± 0.10 |
| Plaque Forming Unit (PFU) | ND | 353.00 ± 32.57 | 372.00 ± 16.97 | 479.00 ± 36.77 |
| PFU per 106 | ND | 13.57 ± 0.23 | 18.37 ± 2.47 | 13.42 ± 0.65 |
| CuSO4 | 3.1 × 10-4 M CuSO4 | |||
| Time after induction (hrs) | 0 | 6 | 24 | 48 |
| OD 750 nm | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.44 ± 0.05 | 0.34 ± 0.01 | 0.36 ± 0.03 |
| Cell numbers (107) | 3.60 ± 0.29 | 1.76 ± 0.14 | 1.12 ± 0.11 | 1.22 ± 0.03 |
| Plaque Forming Unit (PFU) | ND | 483.00 ± 18.39 | 160.00 ± 11.31 | 57.00 ± 9.90 |
| PFU per 106 | ND | 27.44 ± 1.16 | 14.29 ± 0.44 | 4.67 ± 0.70 |
| PFUs change rate for treatment/control | ND | 1.37 ± 0.08 | 0.43 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.01 |
| PFU per 106 | ND | 2.00 | 0.78 | 0.35 |
| PIR (%) | ND | 102.20 ± 5.19 | -22.20 ± 12.60 | -65.20 ± 3.65 |
| CuSO4 | 3.1 × 10-5 M CuSO4 | |||
| Time after induction (hrs) | 0 | 6 | 24 | 48 |
| OD 750 nm | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.36 ± 0.03 | 0.41 ± 0.04 | 0.49 ± 0.01 |
| Cell numbers (107) | 3.60 ± 0.28 | 1.68 ± 0.14 | 1.62 ± 0.01 | 1.875 ± 0.11 |
| Plaque Forming Unit (PFU) | ND | 416.00 ± 8.49 | 345.00 ± 18.39 | 483.00 ± 9.90 |
| PFU per 106 | ND | 24.83 ± 1.58 | 21.30 ± 1.24 | 25.76 ± 0.93 |
| PFUs change rate for treatment/control | ND | 1.18 ± 0.09 | 0.93 ± 0.01 | 1.01 ± 0.06 |
| PFU per 106 | ND | 1.80 | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| PIR (%) | ND | 82.98 ± 8.61 | 15.95 ± 8.79 | 91.95 ± 17.32 |
| CuSO4 | 3.1 × 10-6 M CuSO4 | |||
| Time after induction (hrs) | 0 | 6 | 24 | 48 |
| OD 750 nm | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.38 ± 0.09 | 0.44 ± 0.04 | 0.56 ± 0.01 |
| Cell numbers (107) | 3.60 ± 0.28 | 1.23 ± 0.08 | 1.81 ± 0.10 | 2.66 ± 0.13 |
| Plaque Forming Unit (PFU) | ND | 480.00 ± 25.46 | 526.00 ± 19.80 | 614.00 ± 5.66 |
| PFU per 106 | ND | 39.18 ± 0.41 | 29.06 ± 0.50 | 24.14 ± 0.21 |
| PFUs change rate for treatment/control | ND | 1.40 ± 0.06 | 1.41 ± 0.01 | 1.28 ± 0.09 |
| PFU per 106 | ND | 3.00 | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| PIR (%) | ND | 188.37 ± 1.80 | 58.19 ± 14.00 | 79.88 ± 10.68 |
PIR – Percentage of Increase of Release. ND – Not Detectable.
Figure 3Percentage of Increase of Release (PIR) from CuSOHeavy metal CuSO4 induction: PIR at 6 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours after addition of different concentrations of CuSO4 at day 4 and non-CuSO4 added as a control.
Maximum percentage of increase of release (PIR) of copper, mitomycin C and UV. Comparison of maximum PIR of copper, mitomycin C and UV at different conditions is shown.
| Factor | Conditions | Percentage of Increase of Release (PIR) |
| CuSO4 | 3.1 × 10-6 M at 6 hours of induction | 188.37 ± 2.00 |
| UV | Exposure for 2.5 minutes | 154.38 ± 15.00 |
| Mitomycin C | 0.5 μg/ml at 6 hours of induction | 162.86 ± 4.00 |