OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and transcutaneous electrical neural stimulation (TENS) on the improvement of mouth opening in patients with temporomandibular disorder (TMD). BACKGROUND DATA: TMDs are conditions that affect the form and/or function of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), masticatory muscles, and dental apparatus. Often TMD is associated with pain localized in the TMJ and/or in the muscles of the face and neck. METHODS: This clinical trial was performed in 10 patients, 18-56 years old, diagnosed with TMD of multiple causes. All patients received both methods of treatment in two consecutive weeks. LLLT was delivered via a 670-nm diode laser, output power 50 mW, fluence 3 J per site/4 sites (masseter muscle, temporal muscle, mandibular condyle, and intrauricular). TENS therapy was applied with a two-electrode machine at 20 W, maximum frequency of 60 Hz, adjusted by the patient according to their sensitivity. The amplitude of mouth opening was recorded before treatment and immediately after using a millimeter rule; the measurements were performed from the incisal of the upper incisors to the incisal of the lower incisors. A paired t-test was applied to verify the significance of the results. RESULTS: A significant improvement in the range of motion for both therapies was observed immediately after treatment. Comparing the two methods, the values obtained after LLLT were significantly higher than those obtained after TENS (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Both methods are effective to improve mouth opening. Comparing the two methods, LLLT was more effective than TENS applications.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and transcutaneous electrical neural stimulation (TENS) on the improvement of mouth opening in patients with temporomandibular disorder (TMD). BACKGROUND DATA: TMDs are conditions that affect the form and/or function of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), masticatory muscles, and dental apparatus. Often TMD is associated with pain localized in the TMJ and/or in the muscles of the face and neck. METHODS: This clinical trial was performed in 10 patients, 18-56 years old, diagnosed with TMD of multiple causes. All patients received both methods of treatment in two consecutive weeks. LLLT was delivered via a 670-nm diode laser, output power 50 mW, fluence 3 J per site/4 sites (masseter muscle, temporal muscle, mandibular condyle, and intrauricular). TENS therapy was applied with a two-electrode machine at 20 W, maximum frequency of 60 Hz, adjusted by the patient according to their sensitivity. The amplitude of mouth opening was recorded before treatment and immediately after using a millimeter rule; the measurements were performed from the incisal of the upper incisors to the incisal of the lower incisors. A paired t-test was applied to verify the significance of the results. RESULTS: A significant improvement in the range of motion for both therapies was observed immediately after treatment. Comparing the two methods, the values obtained after LLLT were significantly higher than those obtained after TENS (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Both methods are effective to improve mouth opening. Comparing the two methods, LLLT was more effective than TENS applications.
Authors: Carolina M Carvalho; Juliana A de Lacerda; Fernando P dos Santos Neto; Maria Cristina T Cangussu; Aparecida M C Marques; Antônio L B Pinheiro Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Paulo Roberto Vicente de Paiva; Shaiane Silva Tomazoni; Douglas Scott Johnson; Adriane Aver Vanin; Gianna Móes Albuquerque-Pontes; Caroline Dos Santos Monteiro Machado; Heliodora Leão Casalechi; Paulo de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho; Ernesto Cesar Pinto Leal-Junior Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 3.161