Literature DB >> 16503625

Improved protein recovery in reversed-phase liquid chromatography by the use of ultrahigh pressures.

John W Eschelbach1, James W Jorgenson.   

Abstract

The effect that elevated pressure used in ultrahigh-pressure liquid chromatography (UHPLC) has on protein recovery was investigated. Specifically, protein carryover ("ghosting") and recovery were examined. Four model proteins (ribonuclease A, ovalbumin, myoglobin, BSA) were separated by gradient RPLC at both conventional (160 bar) and ultrahigh pressures (>1500 bar). A custom gradient UHPLC system was used to generate conventional pressures on 5-microm diameter reversed-phase supports and ultrahigh pressures on identical 1.4-microm supports. The results indicate that, by increasing the pressure, protein carryover from run to run is reduced and in some cases eliminated above a certain threshold pressure for the model proteins studied. Further work indicates that recovery was enhanced for each of the proteins studied, even approaching 100% for certain proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16503625     DOI: 10.1021/ac0518304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  13 in total

Review 1.  Accurate mass measurements in proteomics.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Mikhail E Belov; Navdeep Jaitly; Wei-Jun Qian; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Development of a 45kpsi ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography instrument for gradient separations of peptides using long microcapillary columns and sub-2μm particles.

Authors:  Kaitlin M Grinias; Justin M Godinho; Edward G Franklin; Jordan T Stobaugh; James W Jorgenson
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.759

3.  Liquid chromatography above 20,000 PSI.

Authors:  Matthew J Sorensen; Brady G Anderson; Robert T Kennedy
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 12.296

4.  Online Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry for Top-Down Proteomics.

Authors:  Bifan Chen; Ying Peng; Santosh G Valeja; Lichen Xiu; Andrew J Alpert; Ying Ge
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Comparison of two-dimensional fractionation techniques for shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  James A Dowell; Dustin C Frost; Jiang Zhang; Lingjun Li
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  RPLC of intact proteins using sub-0.5 μm particles and commercial instrumentation.

Authors:  Benjamin J Rogers; Robert E Birdsall; Zhen Wu; Mary J Wirth
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Capillary electrophoresis applied to proteomic analysis.

Authors:  Bryan R Fonslow; John R Yates
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.645

8.  The ionic liquid isopropylammonium formate as a mobile phase modifier to improve protein stability during reversed phase liquid chromatography.

Authors:  Ling Zhou; Neil D Danielson
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.205

9.  Native capillary isoelectric focusing for the separation of protein complex isoforms and subcomplexes.

Authors:  Bryan R Fonslow; Seong A Kang; Daniel R Gestaut; Beth Graczyk; Trisha N Davis; David M Sabatini; John R Yates
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 10.  Novel Strategies to Address the Challenges in Top-Down Proteomics.

Authors:  Jake A Melby; David S Roberts; Eli J Larson; Kyle A Brown; Elizabeth F Bayne; Song Jin; Ying Ge
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.109

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.