Steven Jones1, Warren Mansell, Lucy Waller. 1. School of Psychological Sciences, Academic Division of Clinical Psychology, University of Manchester, Second Floor ERC, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK. steven.jones@manchester.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This paper reports two studies concerned with the development and validation of the Hypomania Interpretations Questionnaire (HIQ) designed to assess positive self-dispositional appraisals for hypomania-relevant experiences. METHODS: Study 1: 203 late adolescent participants completed the HIQ along with additional measures of general symptom interpretation, dysfunctional attitudes and hypomanic personality. Study 2: 56 adults with a self-reported diagnosis of bipolar disorder and 39 controls completed a revised HIQ and a measure of current mood symptoms. RESULTS: Study 1: The final 10 item HIQ had two subscales: a) positive self-dispositional appraisals (HIQ-H); and b) normalising appraisals (HIQ-NE). Internal and test-retest reliability were adequate. Hypomanic personality scores were significantly and uniquely predicted by recent hypomania-relevant experiences and HIQ-H score. Study 2: HIQ remained internally reliable within this sample. Bipolar participants (BD) reported more subsyndromal mood symptoms than controls (C) and scored significantly higher on HIQ-H even after covarying for these. HIQ-H was the primary predictor of diagnostic group. Its ability to discriminate BD from C was confirmed by ROC analysis. LIMITATIONS: The studies are cross-sectional and did not include non-bipolar psychiatric control groups. CONCLUSIONS: HIQ appears to be a reliable and valid measure for the assessment of positive self-dispositional appraisals which seem to be linked to both hypomanic personality and bipolar disorder. The relevance of such appraisals for symptom exacerbation, relapse and psychological treatment would merit future investigation.
BACKGROUND: This paper reports two studies concerned with the development and validation of the Hypomania Interpretations Questionnaire (HIQ) designed to assess positive self-dispositional appraisals for hypomania-relevant experiences. METHODS: Study 1: 203 late adolescent participants completed the HIQ along with additional measures of general symptom interpretation, dysfunctional attitudes and hypomanic personality. Study 2: 56 adults with a self-reported diagnosis of bipolar disorder and 39 controls completed a revised HIQ and a measure of current mood symptoms. RESULTS: Study 1: The final 10 item HIQ had two subscales: a) positive self-dispositional appraisals (HIQ-H); and b) normalising appraisals (HIQ-NE). Internal and test-retest reliability were adequate. Hypomanic personality scores were significantly and uniquely predicted by recent hypomania-relevant experiences and HIQ-H score. Study 2: HIQ remained internally reliable within this sample. Bipolar participants (BD) reported more subsyndromal mood symptoms than controls (C) and scored significantly higher on HIQ-H even after covarying for these. HIQ-H was the primary predictor of diagnostic group. Its ability to discriminate BD from C was confirmed by ROC analysis. LIMITATIONS: The studies are cross-sectional and did not include non-bipolar psychiatric control groups. CONCLUSIONS: HIQ appears to be a reliable and valid measure for the assessment of positive self-dispositional appraisals which seem to be linked to both hypomanic personality and bipolar disorder. The relevance of such appraisals for symptom exacerbation, relapse and psychological treatment would merit future investigation.
Authors: Jonathan P Stange; Ashleigh Molz Adams; Jared K O'Garro-Moore; Rachel B Weiss; Mian-Li Ong; Patricia D Walshaw; Lyn Y Abramson; Lauren B Alloy Journal: Behav Ther Date: 2014-09-19
Authors: Jonathan P Stange; Ashleigh R Molz; Chelsea L Black; Benjamin G Shapero; Joanna M Bacelli; Lyn Y Abramson; Lauren B Alloy Journal: Behav Res Ther Date: 2012-01-25
Authors: Jonathan P Stange; Louisa G Sylvia; Pedro Vieira da Silva Magalhães; Ellen Frank; Michael W Otto; David J Miklowitz; Michael Berk; Andrew A Nierenberg; Thilo Deckersbach Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2013-06-21 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Jonathan P Stange; Benjamin G Shapero; Shari Jager-Hyman; David A Grant; Lyn Y Abramson; Lauren B Alloy Journal: Cognit Ther Res Date: 2012-03-06