Literature DB >> 16502750

The sensitivity of three commonly used outcome measures to detect change amongst patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation following stroke.

C K English1, S L Hillier, K Stiller, A Warden-Flood.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the sensitivity of three commonly used functional outcome measures to detect change over time in subjects receiving inpatient rehabilitation post stroke.
DESIGN: Subjects were assessed within one week of admission and one week of discharge from an inpatient rehabilitation facility. Several parameters of sensitivity were calculated, including floor and ceiling effects, the percentage of subjects showing no change and the effect size of the change between admission and discharge.
SETTING: The medical rehabilitation ward of an inpatient rehabilitation facility.
SUBJECTS: Seventy-eight subjects receiving inpatient rehabilitation following a first or recurrent stroke. MEASURES: Five-metre walk, comfortable pace (gait speed), the Berg Balance Scale and the Motor Assessment Scale.
RESULTS: Sixty-one subjects had complete admission and discharge data. Gait speed and the Berg Balance Scale were both sensitive to change and demonstrated large effect sizes. The Motor Assessment Scale item five also showed a large effect size and was able to detect change amongst lower functioning subjects. The other items of the Motor Assessment Scale were less useful, in particular, the effect sizes for upper extremity change scores were small (d=0.36-0.5) and the majority of subjects (44.3-63.9%) showed no change over time on these measures.
CONCLUSION: Gait speed, the Berg Balance Scale and the Motor Assessment Scale item five were sensitive to change over time in this sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16502750     DOI: 10.1191/0269215506cr877oa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rehabil        ISSN: 0269-2155            Impact factor:   3.477


  15 in total

Review 1.  Issues in selecting outcome measures to assess functional recovery after stroke.

Authors:  Sharon Barak; Pamela W Duncan
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2006-10

Review 2.  Assessing walking speed in clinical research: a systematic review.

Authors:  James E Graham; Glenn V Ostir; Steven R Fisher; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 3.  Relationship between test methodology and mean velocity in timed walk tests: a review.

Authors:  James E Graham; Glenn V Ostir; Yong-Fang Kuo; Steven R Fisher; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 4.  Evaluation of Performance-Based Outcome Measures for the Upper Limb: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.

Authors:  Sophie Wang; C Janice Hsu; Lauren Trent; Tiffany Ryan; Nathan T Kearns; Eugene F Civillico; Kimberly L Kontson
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Distance-limited walk tests post-stroke: A systematic review of measurement properties.

Authors:  Darren Kai-Young Cheng; Matthieu Dagenais; Kyla Alsbury-Nealy; Jean Michelle Legasto; Stephanie Scodras; Gayatri Aravind; Pam Takhar; Erica Nekolaichuk; Nancy Margaret Salbach
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 6.  Valid and reliable instruments for arm-hand assessment at ICF activity level in persons with hemiplegia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ryanne J M Lemmens; Annick A A Timmermans; Yvonne J M Janssen-Potten; Rob J E M Smeets; Henk A M Seelen
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 7.  Self-management: a systematic review of outcome measures adopted in self-management interventions for stroke.

Authors:  Emma J Boger; Sara Demain; Sue Latter
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 8.  A systematic review of the responsiveness of lower limb physical performance measures in inpatient care after stroke.

Authors:  Katharine Scrivener; Catherine Sherrington; Karl Schurr
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 2.474

9.  Responsiveness of the ten-metre walk test, Step Test and Motor Assessment Scale in inpatient care after stroke.

Authors:  Katharine Scrivener; Karl Schurr; Catherine Sherrington
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 2.474

10.  The reliability and validity of gait speed with different walking pace and distances against general health, physical function, and chronic disease in aged adults.

Authors:  Hee-Jae Kim; Ilhyoek Park; Hyo Joo Lee; On Lee
Journal:  J Exerc Nutrition Biochem       Date:  2016-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.