Literature DB >> 16502404

Centralizing the non-central chi-square: A new method to correct for population stratification in genetic case-control association studies.

Prakash Gorroochurn1, Gary A Heiman, Susan E Hodge, David A Greenberg.   

Abstract

We present a new method, the delta-centralization (DC) method, to correct for population stratification (PS) in case-control association studies. DC works well even when there is a lot of confounding due to PS. The latter causes overdispersion in the usual chi-square statistics which then have non-central chi-square distributions. Other methods approach the noncentrality indirectly, but we deal with it directly, by estimating the non-centrality parameter tau itself. Specifically: (1) We define a quantity delta, a function of the relevant subpopulation parameters. We show that, for relatively large samples, delta exactly predicts the elevation of the false positive rate due to PS, when there is no true association between marker genotype and disease. (This quantity delta is quite different from Wright's F(ST) and can be large even when F(ST) is small.) (2) We show how to estimate delta, using a panel of unlinked "neutral" loci. (3) We then show that delta2 corresponds to tau the noncentrality parameter of the chi-square distribution. Thus, we can centralize the chi-square using our estimate of 6; this is the DC method. (4) We demonstrate, via computer simulations, that DC works well with as few as 25-30 unlinked markers, where the markers are chosen to have allele frequencies reasonably close (within +/- .1) to those at the test locus. (5) We compare DC with genomic control and show that where as the latter becomes overconservative when there is considerable confounding due to PS (i.e. when delta is large), DC performs well for all values of delta.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16502404     DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  16 in total

1.  A unified approach for quantifying, testing and correcting population stratification in case-control association studies.

Authors:  Prakash Gorroochurn; Susan E Hodge; Gary A Heiman; David A Greenberg
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 0.444

2.  Genetic model selection in two-phase analysis for case-control association studies.

Authors:  Gang Zheng; Hon Keung Tony Ng
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Simultaneously correcting for population stratification and for genotyping error in case-control association studies.

Authors:  K F Cheng; W J Lin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  An improved delta-centralization method for population stratification.

Authors:  Prakash Gorroochurn; Susan E Hodge; Gary A Heiman; David A Greenberg
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 0.444

5.  Influence of population stratification on population-based marker-disease association analysis.

Authors:  Tengfei Li; Zhaohai Li; Zhiliang Ying; Hong Zhang
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 1.670

6.  A large-scale candidate gene analysis of mood disorders: evidence of neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor and opioid receptor signaling dysfunction.

Authors:  Anthony J Deo; Yung-yu Huang; Colin A Hodgkinson; Yurong Xin; Maria A Oquendo; Andrew J Dwork; Victoria Arango; David A Brent; David Goldman; J John Mann; Fatemeh Haghighi
Journal:  Psychiatr Genet       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.458

7.  Genotype-based matching to correct for population stratification in large-scale case-control genetic association studies.

Authors:  Weihua Guan; Liming Liang; Michael Boehnke; Gonçalo R Abecasis
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Designing candidate gene and genome-wide case-control association studies.

Authors:  Krina T Zondervan; Lon R Cardon
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.491

9.  Correlation of population parameters leading to power differences in association studies with population stratification.

Authors:  Y He; R Jiang; W Fu; A W Bergen; G E Swan; L Jin
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 1.670

10.  Genetic association tests: a method for the joint analysis of family and case-control data.

Authors:  Courtney Gray-McGuire; Murielle Bochud; Robert Goodloe; Robert C Elston
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.