Literature DB >> 16501966

Induction of plasticity in the dominant and non-dominant motor cortices of humans.

M C Ridding1, S C Flavel.   

Abstract

There are clear hemispheric differences in the human motor system. Studies using magnetic resonance morphometry have shown that representation of hand muscles is larger in the dominant hemisphere than the non-dominant hemisphere. There is some limited evidence of electrophysiological differences between hemispheres. For example, it has been reported recently that there is less intracortical inhibition in the dominant hemisphere than the non-dominant hemisphere, and it has been hypothesised that this reduction in inhibition may facilitate use-dependent plasticity in the dominant motor cortex. In the present study we examined this hypothesis in human subjects by examining plasticity induction in both dominant and non-dominant hemispheres using an experimental paradigm known to induce motor cortical plasticity, namely paired associative stimulation (PAS). Additionally, we investigated changes in dominant and non-dominant hand performance on a simple ballistic training task. Short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) was also measured for both dominant and non-dominant hands at a range of conditioning intensities. There was significantly less SICI in the dominant motor cortical hand area than in the non-dominant hand area. PAS induced a significant, and similar, increase in motor cortical excitability in both the dominant and non-dominant hemispheres. Motor training resulted in significant performance improvement in both dominant and non-dominant hands. However, there was significantly more improvement in the non-dominant hand. The results from these studies provide some further evidence of electrophysiological differences between the motor cortices of the two hemispheres. Additionally, these findings offer no support for the hypothesis that the dominant hemisphere is positioned more favourably, due to decreased inhibitory tone, than the non-dominant hemisphere for use-dependent plasticity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16501966     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0309-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

1.  Intracortical excitatory and inhibitory phenomena to paired transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy human subjects: differences between the right and left hemisphere.

Authors:  P Cicinelli; R Traversa; M Oliveri; M G Palmieri; M M Filippi; P Pasqualetti; P M Rossini
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2000-07-21       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Inter- and intra-individual variability of paired-pulse curves with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

Authors:  Fumiko Maeda; Massimo Gangitano; Mark Thall; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Subtle hemispheric asymmetry of motor cortical inhibitory tone.

Authors:  Tihomir V Ilic; Patrick Jung; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Noninvasive mapping of muscle representations in human motor cortex.

Authors:  E M Wassermann; L M McShane; M Hallett; L G Cohen
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-02

5.  Mechanisms of enhancement of human motor cortex excitability induced by interventional paired associative stimulation.

Authors:  Katja Stefan; Erwin Kunesch; Reiner Benecke; Leonardo G Cohen; Joseph Classen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals asymmetrical efficacy of intracortical circuits in primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Geoff Hammond; Deb Faulkner; Michelle Byrnes; Frank Mastaglia; Gary Thickbroom
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Asymmetry in the human motor cortex and handedness.

Authors:  K Amunts; G Schlaug; A Schleicher; H Steinmetz; A Dabringhaus; P E Roland; K Zilles
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Interhemispheric differences of hand muscle representation in human motor cortex.

Authors:  P Cicinelli; R Traversa; A Bassi; G Scivoletto; P M Rossini
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.217

9.  A temporally asymmetric Hebbian rule governing plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Wolters; Friedhelm Sandbrink; Antje Schlottmann; Erwin Kunesch; Katja Stefan; Leonardo G Cohen; Reiner Benecke; Joseph Classen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Learning modifies subsequent induction of long-term potentiation-like and long-term depression-like plasticity in human motor cortex.

Authors:  Ulf Ziemann; Tihomir V Ilić; Tihomir V Iliać; Christian Pauli; Frank Meintzschel; Diane Ruge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  12 in total

1.  Hemispheric differences in use-dependent corticomotor plasticity in young and old adults.

Authors:  John Cirillo; Nigel C Rogasch; John G Semmler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Factors influencing the magnitude and reproducibility of corticomotor excitability changes induced by paired associative stimulation.

Authors:  Martin V Sale; Michael C Ridding; Michael A Nordstrom
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Functional reorganization of sensorimotor cortex in early Parkinson disease.

Authors:  M Kojovic; M Bologna; P Kassavetis; N Murase; F J Palomar; A Berardelli; J C Rothwell; M J Edwards; K P Bhatia
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Paired Associative Stimulation Targeting the Tibialis Anterior Muscle using either Mono or Biphasic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Natalie Mrachacz-Kersting; Andrew J T Stevenson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Ten minutes of transcranial static magnetic field stimulation does not reliably modulate motor cortex excitability.

Authors:  Sabrina Lorenz; Birte Alex; Thomas Kammer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Time of day does not modulate improvements in motor performance following a repetitive ballistic motor training task.

Authors:  Martin V Sale; Michael C Ridding; Michael A Nordstrom
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 7.  Modulation of human corticospinal excitability by paired associative stimulation.

Authors:  Richard G Carson; Niamh C Kennedy
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by pairing an auditory stimulus with TMS.

Authors:  Paul F Sowman; Søren S Dueholm; Jesper H Rasmussen; Natalie Mrachacz-Kersting
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Mirror Visual Feedback-Induced Performance Improvement and the Influence of Hand Dominance.

Authors:  Viola Rjosk; Elisabeth Kaminski; Maike Hoff; Bernhard Sehm; Christopher J Steele; Arno Villringer; Patrick Ragert
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  EEG Evoked Potentials to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Normal Volunteers: Inhibitory TMS EEG Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Jing Zhou; Adam Fogarty; Kristina Pfeifer; Jordan Seliger; Robert S Fisher
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.