Literature DB >> 16501897

Differences between hospital- and community-acquired blood exposure incidents revealed by a regional expert counseling center.

P Th L van Wijk1, M Pelk-Jongen, E de Boer, A Voss, C Wijkmans, P M Schneeberger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: One year (2003) regional analysis of all blood exposure incidents from hospitals as well as from the community.
DESIGN: Establishment of an easily accessible regional expert counseling center, operating 24 h a day, for all accidental blood exposures. Tasks of the center were to register incoming calls, to inform and counsel the victim, to assess the risk of the incident, and to provide a plan of further actions, including prophylactic measures.
SETTING: A Dutch region (Northeast Brabant) with 500,000 inhabitants and two major hospitals (1,786 beds).
RESULTS: A total of 454 incidents (1.2 per day) were recorded. Only half of the incidents occurred in the hospital setting (n = 234), whereas the others (n = 220) took place in the community setting. Nearly all (95%, n = 432) incidents occurred during work, and most of them (84%, n = 385) were related to health care activities. In the hospital setting injuries occurred with physicians (13%), nursing staff (45%), operating room (OR) staff (13%), ancillary (18%), others (10%). In the community setting, incidents took place among healthcare workers (48%), detention and police officers (10%), civilians (10%), general practitioners/dentists and their staff (8%), cleaning staff (4%) and work-related incidents not falling into any of the above categories (7%). More low risk incidents took place outside the hospital (87% vs. 68% in hospital), while high-risk incidents predominantly occurred within the hospital setting (23% vs. 6%). The hepatitis-B immunization rate was significantly lower in victims from the community than in those working in hospitals (38% vs. 96%). Reports from incidents in the community setting were delayed.
CONCLUSIONS: Incidents that expose individuals to blood-borne pathogens occur equally frequent in the hospital and non-hospital (community) setting. Therefore, a regional expert counseling center, accessible around-the-clock, for all types of blood-exposure incidents is needed. Blood-exposure prevention programs should aim at a reduction of high-risk incidents within hospitals, and at increasing the awareness for vaccination and early reporting within the community setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16501897     DOI: 10.1007/s15010-006-4125-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  4 in total

1.  Predictors of the initiation of HIV postexposure prophylaxis in Rhode Island emergency departments.

Authors:  Roland C Merchant; Kenneth H Mayer; Bruce M Becker; Allison K Delong; Joseph W Hogan
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.078

2.  Prevalence and prevention of needlestick injuries among health care workers in a German university hospital.

Authors:  Sabine Wicker; Juliane Jung; Regina Allwinn; René Gottschalk; Holger F Rabenau
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Needlestick and sharps injuries among housekeeping workers in hospitals of Shiraz, Iran.

Authors:  Parvin Lakbala; Farbood Ebadi Azar; Hajeb Kamali
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-06-07

Review 4.  Risk of Sharps Injuries to Home Care Nurses and Aides: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Natalie M Brouillette; Margaret M Quinn; David Kriebel
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.162

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.