| Literature DB >> 16501174 |
John Halamka1, Meg Aranow, Carl Ascenzo, David W Bates, Kate Berry, Greg Debor, Jessica Fefferman, John Glaser, Jerilyn Heinold, John Stanley, Diane L Stone, Thomas E Sullivan, Micky Tripathi, Bruce Wilkinson.
Abstract
Massachusetts payers and providers have encouraged clinician usage of e-Prescribing technology to improve patient safety, enhance office practice efficiencies, and reduce medical costs. This report describes three early pilot e-Prescribing projects as case studies. These projects identified the e-Prescribing needs of clinicians, illustrated key issues that made implementation difficult, and clarified the impact of various types of functionality. The authors identified ten key barriers: (1) previous negative technology experiences, (2) initial and long-term cost, (3) lost productivity, (4) competing priorities, (5) change management issues, (6) interoperability limitations, (7) information technology (IT) requirements, (8) standards limitations, (9) waiting for an "all-in-one solution," and (10) confusion about competing product offerings including hospital/Integrated Delivery System (IDN)-sponsored projects. In Massachusetts, regional projects have helped to address these barriers, and e-Prescribing activities are accelerating rapidly within the state.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16501174 PMCID: PMC1513650 DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc ISSN: 1067-5027 Impact factor: 4.497