Literature DB >> 16500118

Low-level exertions of the neck musculature: a study of research methods.

Sharon M B Joines1, Carolyn M Sommerich, Gary A Mirka, James R Wilson, Samuel D Moon.   

Abstract

Musculoskeletal neck discomfort is prevalent in many occupations and has been the focus of much research employing surface electromyography (sEMG). Significant differences in experimental methods among researchers make comparisons across studies difficult. The goal of the current research was to use empirical methods to answer specific methodological questions concerning use of sEMG in evaluation of the neck extensor system. This was accomplished in two studies. In Experiment 1, ultrasound technology was used to: (a) determine accessibility of m. splenius and semispinalis capitis with surface electrodes, (b) identify appropriate electrode locations for these muscles/muscle groups, and (c) illustrate potential benefits of using ultrasound in locating muscles/placing electrodes. Experiment 2 sought to assess effects of posture when normalizing sEMG data. Results from Experiment 1 showed no direct access to semispinalis capitis for surface electrodes; their activity can only be sampled as part of a group of muscles. In most subjects, m. splenius was found to be accessible to surface electrodes. Electrode placement recommendations are provided. Results of Experiment 2 showed significant differences in normalized EMG data between a posture-specific technique and a reference posture technique. Posture-specific normalization is recommended for accurately assessing the relative intensity of contractions of these muscles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16500118     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  7 in total

1.  Co-contraction of cervical muscles during sagittal and coronal neck motions at different movement speeds.

Authors:  Chih-Hsiu Cheng; Kwan-Hwa Lin; Jaw-Lin Wang
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Effects of a 3-month recreative exercise applied to individuals with intellectual disability on their electromyogram (EMG) variations and balance performance.

Authors:  Elif Top; Mustafa Akil
Journal:  Int J Dev Disabil       Date:  2017-04-21

3.  Cervical spine and muscle adaptation after spaceflight and relationship to herniation risk: protocol from 'Cervical in Space' trial.

Authors:  Daniel L Belavy; Gabriele Armbrecht; Kirsten Albracht; Helena Brisby; Deborah Falla; Richard Scheuring; Roope Sovelius; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Kajsa Rennerfelt; Eduardo Martinez-Valdes; Michail Arvanitidis; Fabian Goell; Bjoern Braunstein; Svenja Kaczorowski; Vera Karner; Nitin Kumar Arora
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 2.562

4.  Between-day reliability of electromechanical delay of selected neck muscles during performance of maximal isometric efforts.

Authors:  Sivan Almosnino; Lucie Pelland; Samuel V Pedlow; Joan M Stevenson
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol       Date:  2009-09-23

5.  Balance control and anti-gravity muscle activity during the experience of fear at heights.

Authors:  Max Wuehr; Guenter Kugler; Roman Schniepp; Maria Eckl; Cauchy Pradhan; Klaus Jahn; Doreen Huppert; Thomas Brandt
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2014-02-18

6.  Investigation of the Differential Contributions of Superficial and Deep Muscles on Cervical Spinal Loads with Changing Head Postures.

Authors:  Chih-Hsiu Cheng; Andy Chien; Wei-Li Hsu; Carl Pai-Chu Chen; Hsin-Yi Kathy Cheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparison of cervical muscle isometric force between migraine subgroups or migraine-associated neck pain: a controlled study.

Authors:  Lidiane Lima Florencio; Anamaria Siriani de Oliveira; Carina Ferreira Pinheiro; Tenysson Will-Lemos; Fabíola Dach; César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas; Débora Bevilaqua-Grossi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.