Literature DB >> 16499935

Direction-dependent integration of vision and proprioception in reaching under the influence of the mirror illusion.

Hendrikus J Snijders1, Nicholas P Holmes, Charles Spence.   

Abstract

Recent models of multisensory integration predict differential weighting of information from different sensory modalities in different spatial directions. This direction-dependent weighting account suggests a heavier weighting for vision in the azimuthal (left-right) direction and a heavier weighting for proprioception in the radial (near-far) direction. Visually induced reaching errors, as demonstrated in previous 'mirror illusion' reaching experiments, should therefore be greater under visual-proprioceptive conflict in the azimuthal direction than in the radial direction. We report two experiments designed to investigate the influence of direction-dependent weighting on the visual bias of reaching movements under the influence of a mirror-illusion. In Experiment 1, participants made reaches straight forward, and showed terminal reaching errors that were biased by vision in both directions, but this bias was significantly greater in the azimuthal as compared to the radial direction. In Experiment 2, participants made reaches from right to left, and showed a significant bias only in the azimuthal direction. These results support the direction-dependent weighting of visual and proprioceptive information, with vision relatively more dominant in the azimuthal direction, and proprioception relatively stronger in the radial direction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16499935      PMCID: PMC1705814          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  16 in total

1.  That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb.

Authors:  H Henrik Ehrsson; Charles Spence; Richard E Passingham
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Mislocalizations of touch to a fake hand.

Authors:  Erin L Austen; Salvador Soto-Faraco; James T Enns; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Does limb proprioception drift?

Authors:  J P Wann; S F Ibrahim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see.

Authors:  M Botvinick; J Cohen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Experimentally induced somatagnosia.

Authors:  R Sullivan
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1969-01

6.  Touching the phantom limb.

Authors:  V S Ramachandran; D Rogers-Ramachandran; S Cobb
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves.

Authors:  F Pavani; C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-09

8.  When mirrors lie: "visual capture" of arm position impairs reaching performance.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes; Gemma Crozier; Charles Spence
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Reaching with alien limbs: visual exposure to prosthetic hands in a mirror biases proprioception without accompanying illusions of ownership.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes; Hendrikus J Snijders; Charles Spence
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-05

10.  Multisensory integration during motor planning.

Authors:  Samuel J Sober; Philip N Sabes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  20 in total

1.  Altered visual feedback modulates cortical excitability in a mirror-box-like paradigm.

Authors:  Irene Senna; Cristina Russo; Cesare Valerio Parise; Irene Ferrario; Nadia Bolognini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  The mirror illusion's effects on body state estimation.

Authors:  Tamer M Soliman; Laurel J Buxbaum; Steven A Jax
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Optokinetic stimulation induces illusory movement of both out-of-the-body and on-the-body hand-held visual objects.

Authors:  P Revol; A Farnè; L Pisella; N P Holmes; A Imai; K Susami; K Koga; Y Rossetti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visual illusion of tool use recalibrates tactile perception.

Authors:  Luke E Miller; Matthew R Longo; Ayse P Saygin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-02-11

5.  Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine.

Authors:  Daisuke Tajima; Tota Mizuno; Yuichiro Kume; Takako Yoshida
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Interaction between vibration-evoked proprioceptive illusions and mirror-evoked visual illusions in an arm-matching task.

Authors:  Mikio Tsuge; Masahiko Izumizaki; Kazuyoshi Kigawa; Takashi Atsumi; Ikuo Homma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Adaptation to proprioceptive targets following visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jenna C Flannigan; Ruth J Posthuma; Jesse N Lombardo; Chelsea Murray; Erin K Cressman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Proprioceptive accuracy in Immersive Virtual Reality: A developmental perspective.

Authors:  Irene Valori; Phoebe E McKenna-Plumley; Rena Bayramova; Claudio Zandonella Callegher; Gianmarco Altoè; Teresa Farroni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The weight of representing the body: addressing the potentially indefinite number of body representations in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Marjolein P M Kammers; Joris Mulder; Frédérique de Vignemont; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Innovative approaches to the rehabilitation of upper extremity hemiparesis using virtual environments.

Authors:  A S Merians; E Tunik; G G Fluet; Q Qiu; S V Adamovich
Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.874

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.